if you don't just tell the AI "hey write about this and that" and everyone seems to be unaware of this being a possibility.
YEs. I think you have to use it to see that, and use it with intelligence and figuring out how it works. I'm not sure many people are doing that - they are quickly labelling it as an enemy, or a drawcard to whip up something in two seconds to gain rewards of some kind. Used intelligently, it's an entirely different story.
Also, here, you've literally said 'hey I used it' - that's perfect! Now I can choose whether to vote or not. Only reason I'm not is that my VP is too low!
For some reason, most people complain about zero-effort posts that are generated by AI. I don't get that because they are so easy to spot and are rarely interesting to read through. If big curators are responsible with their votes they should be able to spot that and decide to avoid voting on it or downvote an overreawarded post like that.
But let's say that someone makes a post with GPT saying "write me a post about legendary tennis players", and that post garners a shit ton of engagement with the person publishing post. Is that value? Should that be upvoted and encouraged?
Interesting question. I still don't think it should be rewarded, but that could be black and white of me. Yet that's not a bad thing either. Doesn't that mean people are going to chuck out a lot of AI posts on the blind hope people will engage and reward? If this kind of value is end game, why isn't a little sentence at the end saying 'This was co written with ChatGPT' or 'This was written by CHAT GPT in response to the prompt x' a good idea? If people really believed in the AI they'd do this but for most part they are doing it just for the rewards.
Interestingly I find when they do that they aren't sourcing their images either, AI gen or not.
I don't think that's the case because people generally don't like spammers and those just looking to extract value won't bother doing that manual part where you need to actually talk to other human beings (I think), haha.
But sure, having a disclaimer might be the best way to go in terms of transparency but in my opinion, if I enjoyed the content and/or learned something from it, and/or engaged with it. I don't see why that disclaimer would even matter, right?
Nah, I wanna know. There's enough lies and deception on the internet as it is.
That's cool, but those that will use it maliciously won't tell you anyway.
Nope, but I'll try my best to figure it out and rain on their parade if I suspect! 😂😂😂