You are right, in Leofinance there is a flat curve, but can it be that voting behavior still reflects partly the "old style"? Maybe also, because the Hive rewards of the upvotes are still penalized for small-reward posts? I am just searching for an explanation that always the same authors gets such a large stake of the rewards. I have the impression that some of them can write anything repetitive or random stuff and still get more votes than 90% of all others.
E.g. I stopped writing finance-specific topics after e.g. this and this were largely ignored.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: