This my point, using a tool for unintended purposes isn't right or wrong, it is just how it gets applied. I personally am one of the people who will make do with what is available, rather than buying a specific tool for the job. I find it part of my creative process to "fix" something with stuff that wasn't designed for that purpose. Everyone has used a knife as a screwdriver...
The blockchain workarounds are interesting as it is generally frowned upon to bypass the blockchain, even though that is essentially part of the code. Of course, there are more value adding actions than others.
I understood that, people get to wrapped up in "that is not designed for that" issues. Tools are tools if it get the job done it worked. More people need to figure that out, and not be so petty about using things in manners not designed to be used.
!ENGAGE
I need practice remembering that above.
In regards to the ENGAGE, putting a number after, r.g !ENGAGE 20 will distribute that number of the tokens - without the number it will distribute 1 :)
See it has been awhile, I thought it was auto 25 with no number. So let me try and fix that, !ENGAGE 25. Thank you for that information now I know.
ENGAGEtokens.ENGAGEtokens.ENGAGEtokens.