For instance, 250 people might decide that a repost is worth being rewarded, and one person controlling enough stake can remove all of those rewards because of their personal views against reposting.
250 could be brand new accounts with no stake and 1 person with 15 Hive Power. There is a reason why one vote one account is not feasible.
If one person owns $1M worth of Hive and the 250 collectively own $10k, do you think the $1M should have more say?
You can get thousands of people with no investment, doesn't mean they deserve control.