With time we get enough content that would rank well. The problem is the offpage.
Retardo SEO people talk a lot about onpage. Like do great content, do this, do that.
It doesn't matter 98%. Most work is offpage, the work nobody honor and sees.
Everyone can Copywrite a 3000-word text that would theoretically rank good. This text will in 99% never rank.
Simple more spreading, more guest posts, simple more high-quality links. And yes social media shares bring something, only on aged, old and well-connected profiles. Normal shares are close to worthless.
More traffic means, better silo onpage + offpage work.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
External link building doesn't have to cost that much if done right. Especially as we have an army of writers at our fingertips who are paid by the blockchain.
We could fund it with upvotes, if none of the big hitters wanted to spend the Hive fund on marketing that actually offers value.
Just have to get that base of good quality content here first and then have a clear strategy around keywords that our link building needs to target.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
First, it is the most expensive part of any website. Sure you can use PBN or something else. But if you do real PR work it goes fast into a tenth of thousands.
Also, we lost years of domain aging with the split.
I think you have no clue about the topic on an industrial scale.
The question is not to rank useless user content. It is ranking a hole site on everything with smart branding and PR work. Leverage the time.
sorry sounds like a noob strategy. It would be the most retarded to target keywords on average blog content.
Sure if we want parasite-host into penalty we could do it.