Sort:  

Hmm, let’s take your account as an example. Have you wondered why your current vote value is $1.027 while your max vote value is $1.225? That’s because your Voting Mana is currently at 83.80%.

1000065090.jpg

In the new system, however, your current vote value will remain at $1.225 regardless of your Voting Mana level.

For me, that’s the beauty of the new system... I no longer have to keep adjusting my upvote percentage just to ensure that every author I support receives the same vote value I intend to give. 😁

Yes I understand but you mentioned mana level still important, why then if nothing changes?

Good question! Mana still matters because it determines how many votes we can cast... the difference now is that the value of each upvote won’t decrease as mana depletes.

Basically, it’s still important for us to monitor our mana and keep it at a healthy level. We should aim to give around 10 full (100%) upvotes per day so that our mana can fully replenish daily as well.

hmm ok - never had a look on mama, i jsut tried to stay over 80% kind of - we will find out then :-)

That’s great! In that case, you might not need to change anything about your curation. But yeah, let’s see how this new feature will change the dynamics among curators. 😁

Then, I wonder what sense will have the use of the "voting slider" in this case from now on. Although I suspect that continuing to use it as we have been using it until now, will probably have more to do with the number of votes we could give in a day, regardless of whether they all have the same value.

I see what you mean. Actually, I wanted to watch someone test it out for themselves, to go all the way down to zero mana. I’m curious what kind of benefit they might get from that. And if the action really is abusive, I believe there are curators who will simply counter it with downvotes. :D