"The Decentralization Matrix" ¿How decentralized is hypocrisy and doublespeak in the blockchain?

in FreeSpeech2 years ago (edited)

What would you say if I told you that there is an article that was published in our blockchain three days ago and that until the moment I write this post it has received 544 upvotes accumulating $437.06 bucks for now and that it has been upvoted by all the best & smartest "curators" and largest HP shareholders of our blockchain which now have not valuable content whatsoever? ¡Kind of a ghost post if you ask me!

Oh! but don't get me wrong. The article in question in fact has or had great value. It's just that it doesn't seem to vindicate its value for those who actually paid for its "content" here in our blockchain. Which is to say that we all pay for it. Absolutely all of us. Only that the best & smartest "curators" and largest HP shareholders of our blockchain they decided to grant that amount of do$h to it susbtracting it and distributing our tokens from our "collective rewards pool" to this article in question without even consulting us. ¿How interesting do you find this grand maneuver?

However, it may have and will add some value to other blockchains and social networks out there on the information superhighway. Like by instance: Odysee, Rokfin, Cos.tv, Bittube, Bastyon, Read.cash, Noise.cash, Torum, Minds, Gettr, Publish0x, d.tube, and curiously also to Steemit and Blurt.

This last known social network in the blockchain of these named above, with interesting and revealing comments and interaction in its publication that you will surely be interested in reading. But basically adding value to all of them except Hive, which has been the one that paid the highest price of all. Same as it won't add any value to Leofinance or 3Speak as a couple of its biggest "curation" investors and sources of support who are also DApps based on the Hive blockchain.

But again, ¡Don't get me wrong! This great article for which we paid $437 bucks, so far, it will also add value to Youtube and/or to its author via Youtube. Which seems fine to me. Since from my point of view, it is precisely the video what really adds value to his article here on the Hive blockchain. And the video is indeed really good.

It's just a pity, that due to the whatever circumstances that had been. It has been us, the entire shareholders of the Hive blockchain (large and small investors) who have now been left without the value product for which we have all paid. And that's why I am about to try to claim and recover at least a part of that value for which we all have paid, right here below through this article of mine.

Yeah! Enjoy the product!

I really don't know if it was Scott himself who deleted the video (or even his whole account) on 3Speak. Since it was in fact the platform in charge of preserving the value product for which we have already paid almost five hundred dollars in Hive.

Which would really seem a bit strange to me. But that for a platform always under development and in constant updates like 3Speak, it wouldn't be so strange if these spontaneous disappearances, intriguing and uncanny occurrences would happen with some frequency over there a little bit too often.

Therefore, I invite you right now to click on both of the colored words immediately above that say 3Speak so that you can make comparisons and draw your own conclusions about what the hell has happened and is happening here right now.

Nonetheless, and without wanting to delve into unassailable conspiracy theories and unconquerable captious speculations. Let me now focus on the leading subject and concentrate on the critical question that gives live, sense and title to this post. ¿How decentralized is hypocrisy and doublespeak in the Hive blockchain?

I guess it's no secret to anyone how many good authors on Hive over the years have been reprimanded, harassed, punished, silenced, demonetized, ostracized and downvoted to oblivion. Until the point to finally chase them away, expelled and banished from our blogger's community of content creation authors for the simple fact of sharing their valuable content on other rival social networks by duplicating it (or sextupplicating it) also over here in our exquisite & exclusive blockchain whose pressure has been exerted by the biggest Hive shareholders and stuborn SJW always alert and attentive to the most sacred codes of ethics and pristine principles of the highest manners and good customs of the manual of conduct in our ecosystem.

And this case that I expose throughout this post today, although still shrouded in full mystery, seems to be one of them. Obviously with its own singularities and differences. Since this one, curiously, would have been chased away through plenty of upvotes and great support and with a good bag of money in his pockets.

But yeah, I do not want to rush or anticipate the real facts. There will always be the benefit of the doubt and prolly someone who knows a little more about the true events going on and who could be able to shed a bit more light on the unfathomable mysteries of the Hive blockchain will come here soon to clear it up for us.

¿What do you think? ¿Will someone come soon to clarify the doubt? Is someone over here really knowledgeable and judicious who might be able to calculate this with total accuracy and reveal to us in all its splendor ¿How decentralized is hypocrisy and doublespeak in the blockchain? Yeah, I will wait here sitting just in case.

Leave a comment. Share your experiences and feedback. ¡Be part of the conversation!

«««-$-»»»

"Follows, Comments, Rehives & Upvotes will be highly appreciated"

Cranky Gandalf

Cheers!

Sort:  

Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation, and Liberty. We are a peaceful and non-violent movement that sees information as being held back by corrupt forces in the private sector and government. Our Mission.
  • Discord, website, youtube channel links here.

Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded