A picture is circulating on the Internet showing German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser and Labor Minister Hubertus Heil on a visit to Ukraine. Whatever both of them are doing there, they can be seen standing on a balcony in Kiev with a glass of champagne in their hands, having a nice and relaxed time together with the mayor of Kiev, Vitali Klitschko, during the war.🥂
Of course, the "official version" was much nicer, namely that similar to the case of terrible environmental disasters, German politicians immediately and completely selflessly rush to the front, stand right there with flak jackets, pose and have pictures taken of themselves death-defyingly in front of the rubble in Kiev. This is roughly how the reasons for the visits of these politicians were presented, in which it was also about the hard work that the two have done during their "engagement".
As we can see, in the meantime something completely different has come out of this "staging", namely the truth, which caused a huge shitstorm. The fun German politicians had with the Klitschkos in this country damaged by the "proxy war" (USA > Ukraine VS Russia) was called by them "Noble War tourism", which, of course, did not contribute to a positive external effect and invited many people to caricature this behavior publicly.
If one considers which suffering the people in such war areas must suffer, while western politicians pose at the same time in the same country publicly so carefree before the camera and present to the world with pleasure their carefree and luxurious life, then the question already arises, what kind of people govern here and how they behave only if the cameras are switched off and they feel unobserved.🙄
You see, after many years of mainstream politicians at least making an effort to keep up appearances and hide from the common people they have no moral compass, lately you see more and more often this paradoxical behavior among the pseudo-moralists, which is unabashedly and quite deliberately communicated to the outside world (it's not like any paparazzi had to expose their hypocrisy in a big way).
These politicians, of all people, now want to convey to their own people that, for reasons of decency, they would have to resign themselves to freezing for peace in order to be able to harm the Russian economy by refusing their cheap gas. At the same time, the prices for the remaining gas and that from alternative sources are quadrupled by the introduced gas levy, which probably "only" German people with their high frustration tolerance will accept for a while in future.🥶
Beyond all morality, the main thing seems to be the sale of 100 self-propelled howitzers to Ukraine was approved in order to prolong a war whose outcome has long been clear to any halfway clear-thinking person anyway, no matter how many people will die additionally and unnecessarily as a result, because after "Big Pharma" also the arms industry finally wants to earn a lot of money again.🔫 💲
By the way, the keyword here is "sell", because the deliveries of weapons and war equipment to Ukraine are always so readily presented as "noble deeds", but are a lucrative business conducted at the expense of the victims of war. One should ask oneself perhaps times, who pays all this, then one would find out fast the Ukraine is supplied constantly with "aid credits", which must be paid back one day with "interest". At this time the Ukrainian people will understand, what really all the time behind the (alleged) "assistance" of the west was!
What will actually become of this country exploited for a "proxy war" of the USA against Russia when the war is over? What kind of future would a country have to expect even in case of an unrealistic victory against one of the three world powers, that all the time takes out costly loans to be able to pay for military resources, because the Western world considers it important this country fights to the last man or meanwhile even to the last woman? What future is there for a country whose citizens are being sacrificed, in part against their will, on the front lines for economic interests of the arms industry, whose representatives also present themselves as "supporters of a peace mission"?
Since politicians and media deliberately focus solely on Russia, not many people are currently thinking about Ukraine's debt burden caused by loans, which citizens will later have to pay back with compound interest and because of which they will find themselves in the stranglehold of their "debtors" in future, whom they now still consider "friends" (USA/EU).
Of course, the IMF, the International Monetary Fund could step in in case of emergency, but in return for its (not selfless) help then also "privatize" all sorts of things, so that big corporations also have something from the whole lucrative spectacle, which is fueled and prolonged by the Military-industrial complex (MIK), so that they can enrich themselves from it for longer.🤑😈
Sometimes states and their citizens have to learn the hard way the enemy of their enemy is not automatically their friend and that "false friends" can pose a greater threat to a country than real enemies in a conflict which has been fomented for years by (so-called) "allies" for economic reasons.