Sort:  

Hello.

It seems that the video is a word-for-word reading of someone's content. You have added all sources but omitted adding this particular source which is the most important (you have added it after our comment). This gives an impression of intentional omission.
You did not mention in your post that you are reading someone's article. The video was posted in a way that suggests that you are using your own words.

Good morning, I did not intentionally omit anything, I have no need to steal content from anyone as you can see in any of my more than 300 videos on 3speak, I added the source after the comment because you requested it and because to be honest this script has more than a year with me since I have used it for my classes on fashion history. I appreciate the work you do, but I don't think I'm the right person to focus your efforts to look for plagiarism in hive.

The source you are requesting has already been added to the rest of the sources I posted one by one, if you need me to do anything else you can notify me.

Hello.

Your post was reported by someone and we consider the report valid.

If you read the content that was written by someone else, we would appreciate it if you mention it in your post/video and give a proper credit/source.

Reading someone else's words does not count as original content and is considered plagiarism, regardless that it is speech, not a text.