If the rep system worked well, I think this would be a decent approach and you are right, people should be able to post whatever shit they want, but getting rewarded/unrewarded on it is up o the community. It would be interesting to not only take reputation away from poor curation, but have some economic incentive also. If the reputation system actually worked, it could be used to give some kind of small multiplier affect to voting - this way, the "best" accounts would benefit from their past activities, not just their staked activities.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: