RE: Warning, please don't encourage the self-voting/vote-selling of the @ph-fund initiative

[devotedman]

I want to say that when I joined Project Hope, I wasn't forced to add the ph-fund as beneficiary. I understood that the idea was great, and the community needs to sustain itself, so it can be there of us the members. The funds that PH community generates, it uses a lot of it for the benefit of the members. As it helps member get health care, education and so on. It's a mutually benefitting relationship.

And ProjectHope votes on good posts, plagiarism free. Downvoting the hard work of authors is just not right. This is a decentralized system, we have our freewill to add beneficiaries to whoever we deem fit. Kindly have a rethink, and stop all this. Do have a nice day!

Comments

[adamada]

I understood that the idea was great, and the community needs to sustain itself, so it can be there of us the members. The funds that PH community generates, it uses a lot of it for the benefit of the members.

What's wrong with it just creating it's own posts to self upvote and setting the community members as beneficiaries? it's what you do only the opposite and this gives more value to the members involved than the other way around. Members could just send their liquid rewards to the community account if they believe in it so much. The whole 50% is just a means to be sophisticated as self voting.

And ProjectHope votes on good posts, plagiarism free. Downvoting the hard work of authors is just not right.

This isn't plagiarism?