Sort:  

Woops, only checked the reply tab and thought we were still on pennsif's post.

TL;DR: they're forcing people to give them 50% of post rewards in exchange for votes so that they can "grow" to be "sustainable", in general the content they curate is mostly of spun articles and of course they've gone on to only vote on posts giving them the 50% kickback which basically is selfvoting.

Ah... I see, that is unfair conduct. They are only think how to get HP as fast they can by using another user who want get vote without thinking for long term.

Thanks for your clearly answer and explain 🙏🏻

Are you part of the curation team involved in this?

$30 rewards to one person for reporting he's curated 5 posts seems a bit steep, no? If there's more people involved and it's reflected in the beneficiaries transparently going to each then maybe it's acceptable although still a bit steep on autovotes. I don't see any other curation projects getting $6 per curated post reported in autovotes. Not even going to get into hbd being more than $1.

I am not quite sure, honestly I don't too active make post and know what happened in this platform lately, but your post and warning is quite valuable for me to be careful and aware how to maintain Hive by make a good self discipline and good manner🙏🏻