As listed recently in the news, the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken has become the first crypto company to receive a bank charter.
This is a first step that may lead to broader adoption of crypto by the general public.
It is important to notice that what has been granted to Kraken is not a full-fledged national banking license or an industrial loan company charter, but a special-purpose depository institution license from Wyoming.
This is relevant because it represents a significant stepping stone in a state-wide development process that has been in the works for some time. In March 2019, Wyoming had enacted a total of 13 blockchain-enabling laws, making it the only US state to provide a cryptocurrency-friendly legal framework that allows blockchain technology developments for individuals and companies.
There is little doubt this is a calculated move backed by the federal government to bring capital, jobs, and revenue into Wyoming.
Much like Delaware represents a unique case for its corporate law - thanks to which many of America's biggest companies are incorporated in Delaware - the goal is to provide a dedicated infrastructure to incentivize the broader adoption of cryptocurrencies and the development of crypto-oriented businesses.
In other words, Wyoming is making a big push to become the Delaware of digital asset law.
The effect of Wyoming's laws are already visible as, besides Kraken, more companies are coming in the field: as announced already since February 2020, Caitlin Long, a former Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse managing director, is starting a special-purpose depository institution (SPDI) that will provide payment and custody services to institutional investors and corporate treasurers, and six more companies have already applied for the charter in the state.
One important aspect of the SPDI charter is that while the company can hold digital assets, it won't have legal ownership to them. Caitlin Long, CEO of Avanti, said this is in accordance with the U.S. uniform commercial code, which means should the SPDI become bankrupt, the assets are returned to the customers 100%.
(source: IBTimes)
This is in stark contrast with a classic crypto exchange, where in case of bankruptcy or critical failure all customers' assets can be lost, and represents a significant advantage to provide peace of mind for customers and investors.
While only time will tell about the long term success of Kraken, the foundation laid by Wyoming's digital asset law and the resulting increased interest in providing the infrastructure between fiat and cryptocurrencies can set the momentum to start bridging the gap between the two worlds and increasing the adoption of digital coins in everyday use.
This is an important step for the mass adoption of crypto.
It can indeed set the foundation for a trend of broader adoption, and having explicit support from a US state makes a lot of difference.
Hello @lucabarbera, Thank you for bringing this important news to all of us.
Hola @lucabarbera, Gracias por hacer llegar esta noticia tan importante a todos nosotros.
Hola @elmundodexao, thank you for stopping by and commenting! I'm glad you liked the article.
Congratulations @lucabarbera! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:
good article, from my opinion the banks since several years ago want to regulate the coin market not for progress but for more control that's why I don't consider this news to be helpful for the coin environment
Indeed two very different approaches can be taken by classic banking institutions: one is to embrace&conquer, and the other is to adopt. It is technically for classic banks to take the first with a long term goal, as you said, to enter the market for the purpose of controlling it from the inside; however, the decentralized nature of crypto makes this very difficult, to the point of being inconvenient. Banks will only do what suits their bottom line, and it would take more than an isolated effort to have any significant control (not to mention crypto can always redefine itself with a new unbiased token).
Upvoted 👌 (Mana: 10/40)