I was referring to the 'Korean community'. Not JS and his dealings. That's another matter and unrelated.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I was referring to the 'Korean community'. Not JS and his dealings. That's another matter and unrelated.
You aren't that special. There are at least 5 backup witnesses behind you who will do just fine.
That's not the point. This could've been not about me at all. Asking to change two consensus witnesses like this isn't right. We can argue over HW, over plag, over whatever we want, agree, disagree, but without inciting a consensus change. If people decide to vote however after reading replies that's on them.
People can vote however they want with their stake in governance. Tough luck.
Yes, we agree on that. That's why I'm talking about inciting, which is directing others how to vote.
He can't force them. So, whatever you said is a moot point and pure nonsense.
I didn't say force.
and what's about witnesses advertising themselves? Inciting, directig others how to vote?
This is ridicolous.
Asking to put two specific witnesses into consensus would be the same exact thing. The point is to replace the consensus. We know how that goes as we're coming up on 3 years of Hive.
Or, you could stop being narcissistic and pretend all the witnesses right behind you have no consensus witness experience or hold malice towards the chain.
Aha, the finger on the sore. It really hurts when they find and hit you straight on the Achilles heel. ¿Huh?