his is no different than what people who claimed to represent the Korean community did pre-Hive. They incited others to vote as they've instructed, they supported the hostile takeover enabling it, and they directly contributed to the theft of millions from innocent witnesses and stakeholders. You are trying to change part of the consensus for a frivolous reason, without taking into mind the security of Hive, just like them. There's no place for a repeat of that in any form on Hive.*
Screw off. You aren't the only "community witness" on the chain. Don't try to compare this situation to JSun colluding with Binance to overwhelm consensus.
I was referring to the 'Korean community'. Not JS and his dealings. That's another matter and unrelated.
You aren't that special. There are at least 5 backup witnesses behind you who will do just fine.
That's not the point. This could've been not about me at all. Asking to change two consensus witnesses like this isn't right. We can argue over HW, over plag, over whatever we want, agree, disagree, but without inciting a consensus change. If people decide to vote however after reading replies that's on them.
People can vote however they want with their stake in governance. Tough luck.
Yes, we agree on that. That's why I'm talking about inciting, which is directing others how to vote.
He can't force them. So, whatever you said is a moot point and pure nonsense.
I didn't say force.
and what's about witnesses advertising themselves? Inciting, directig others how to vote?
This is ridicolous.
Asking to put two specific witnesses into consensus would be the same exact thing. The point is to replace the consensus. We know how that goes as we're coming up on 3 years of Hive.
Aha, the finger on the sore. It really hurts when they find and hit you straight on the Achilles heel. ¿Huh?