I agree that it's a great introduction to Nietzsche's philosophy, and Durant does a good job of explaining Nietzsche's ideas in a clear and concise way.
I also agree that some of Nietzsche's ideas are quite extreme, and I can see why you find them toxic. However, I think it's important to remember that Nietzsche was a complex and contradictory figure, and his ideas should be interpreted in light of his entire body of work.
For example, Nietzsche's views on women are often cited as evidence of his misogyny, but it's important to remember that he also wrote extensively about the importance of love and compassion. In fact, some of his most famous passages are about the need for us to overcome our egotism and connect with others on a deeper level.
Ultimately, I think it's up to each individual to decide what they think of Nietzsche's ideas. There's no right or wrong answer, and it's important to be open-minded and willing to consider different perspectives.
I appreciate your thoughtful feedback. As I stated in my essay:
I spent years studying literature. I have read countless 'interpretations' of literary pieces. These interpretations are more about the critic than they are about the pieces. I turn to the text and let that speak. Interpretation is subjective.
If Nietzsche wanted to say something, if he wanted to value women and the feminine as highly as he valued men and the masculine, then he was perfectly capable of saying that. If he valued kindness, compassion and pity (yes pity--there is a place for pity) then he was perfectly capable of saying that. Please, find for me where he does. Find for me where he repudiates his harsh statements. Then I will place some weight on that.
Otherwise, his words speak for themselves--especially the words written in his later works, which would reflect a more mature, settled judgement