Why not the truth? -> Because I wanted to procreate, as I was designed to do.
Do you believe the stickleback was "designed" to adapt to living in rivers and streams?
Why not the truth? -> Because I wanted to procreate, as I was designed to do.
Do you believe the stickleback was "designed" to adapt to living in rivers and streams?
Sure do. I am GLAD you said ADAPT and not EVOLVE! You used the appropriate word where most others do not.
Since forever I have been telling everyone that if I were God I would 'CREATE' my creations to 'ADAPT' to all changes.......like,,, duh Atheists :D
Thanks for the trigger-warning!
It wasn't supposed to 'Trigger' anything but the logical sensory apparatus' peering about.
My hypothetical -if I were- scenario was not linked to personal feelings, but Logic. It is very logical to program your creations/inventions to 'Adapt' to foreseen changes, is it not? That is, unless you were creating something you wished to 'expire' after a certain period of time........like.....'Cyclical Consumption'....
I was referring to your warning about using the word "evolution".
So do you think the things that engineered humans also engineered plants and fish?
Yes. Like, Hemp. I think Hemp was engineered for our use.
Fish, I am not sure.
Do you think the "engineers" found earth and modified existing plants and animals, or do you think they planned the planetary formation and specifically designed each plant and animal?
According to all writings I have read on it, Earth(Heart) was modified.
Myself I don't think either way. I have a hunch the writings are correct.
Details in Enoch and other works.