We monkeys like confusing the f out of each other for monkey status, no, it was "the universe", a word for something we don't even fully understand yet, but simply named it.
Don't you think that logically, GOD(S) = COSMOS?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
We can use any kind sound we like and then convert it to a 6 letter written word if we want, but it will never be that 6 letter word.
All I'm saying is, we were created.
If not, show me 1 single thing that just poefs into existence.
Whatever the "something" was that "made us" is, in all likelihood, UNKNOWABLE (beyond our comprehension).
And unless (or until) we find some very specific, independently verifiable, scientific evidence of "intent", that incomprehensible "CREATOR" is functionally identical to "NO-GOD(S)".
We have, we just haven't been looking correctly, it's in our face and we believe what we are told.
We know the sun is part of it, we know electricity is part of it, we know the universe is part of it, we know we are part of it, we know the minerals are part of it and what ever we name is part of it, even Hive is part of it. 🤠
Ha, you just admitted we were created, and thus also admitting there is a "creator". 🤠
Let me say it one sentence, most science is evidence of creation.
Naming the words are interestingly enough is far from understanding them. That's just step 1.
Enter the domain of wordless thought ;)
And see mysteries unravel, because the current words are holding us back due to inaccuracy and limitations.
And when you declare victory of understanding, after simply naming something or copying a definition without visualization it's nothing.
It means you stop at step 1. And if you look around, that's the really case.
Yes. I have no aversion to being identified as a DEIST.
Because it's a hypothesis with absolutely ZERO moral (or practical) implications.
Trust me, it's better this side, otherwise you may end up arguing over never ending words all day. :D :D
Which "side"?
I'm already a DEIST, so, which "side" are you on?