There was a glitch in the curation reward department. If a post said $100 for instance, half of which goes to curators, and someone came along to vote on a post published before the hardfork, that voter would get the entire 50%, and those who voted before the hardfork lose all those curation rewards. Technically, nobody is voting on old posts. They're simply working to ensure an individual can't take the entire portion and keep it to themselves. Or in other words, there's money on the table and they're scrambling to snatch up as much as they can, with good intentions to boot. Something like that.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ahh, gotcha. Good old hard fork weirdness...
Thanks for clearing that up!
Yeah. Hard to predict this stuff and it's minor hiccup, not massive, so whatever. Kind of funny someone with 20 HP could earn a buck or even $50 with the push of a vote button, depending on the post value. If nobody noticed, some would be getting rich, but since more voters come in after, they share the rewards a little more fairly I guess. The author portion was not affected.