You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Once upon a time there was a "social network" on the blockchain.

in Fuckery10 months ago

Stay in tune for my next post where I will reveal much of these unholy maneuvers on the blockchain.

I'm all for shedding light on how the math works around here.
I've had enough people deny the facts when they knew better, but they had enough charisma stake for truth not to matter to those that would follow.
Greedy folks gonna greed.
Bootlickers gonna lick boots.

If you could show how little of the rewards pool makes it outside the top 100 authors, I'd like to see it.
I know from dalz that 50% of the pool goes to 20 accounts, less than 20 people, day after day after day since at least the fork.
It was worse in the past, I'm sure.

But, irrespective of all that, the fact remains no tech out there can compete with us on a level field.
The more we level our own field the more users that will be attracted to a balanced economy.
At some point, we can make it so that 1000 accounts are needed to get to the first 50% of rewards.
Then we will know large scale adoption.

As things are, nobody buys in to make a dozen hivizens the new redshills.
That is a pipe dream of deluded people.

Sort:  
Loading...