Sounds like a good argument to power up, and not to dump.
Well, as long as you belong to the elite BitShares brotherhood. };)
If all the newbs dump then they will win.
It all depends. They win anyway through a multitude of unholy maneuvers draining the collective rewards pool into their own wallets with no one selling anything. Stay in tune for my next post where I will reveal much of these unholy maneuvers on the blockchain.
It is nearly impossible to find folks not dumping everything 'the community' gives them.
That's right! But the big fishes of the BitShares brotherhood also are dumping everything in a sneaky way without 'the community' having given it to them.
I'm all for shedding light on how the math works around here.
I've had enough people deny the facts when they knew better, but they had enough
charismastake for truth not to matter to those that would follow.Greedy folks gonna greed.
Bootlickers gonna lick boots.
If you could show how little of the rewards pool makes it outside the top 100 authors, I'd like to see it.
I know from dalz that 50% of the pool goes to 20 accounts, less than 20 people, day after day after day since at least the fork.
It was worse in the past, I'm sure.
But, irrespective of all that, the fact remains no tech out there can compete with us on a level field.
The more we level our own field the more users that will be attracted to a balanced economy.
At some point, we can make it so that 1000 accounts are needed to get to the first 50% of rewards.
Then we will know large scale adoption.
As things are, nobody buys in to make a dozen hivizens the new redshills.
That is a pipe dream of deluded people.