See another comment I just made to you. From what I can see of the video it appears she may have been stabbed after death as the blood appeared to have already coagulated.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
See another comment I just made to you. From what I can see of the video it appears she may have been stabbed after death as the blood appeared to have already coagulated.
Dude I was merely pointing out what I thought wasn't adding up in the video. Even the guy who the reporter was asking questions to didn't seem like he was being on the level. I've read and seen horrible stuff from different sides, one reason I watched it so closely to begin with. Usually these stories break than a couple days later the accused group comes out and disputes what happened. That's why it's good to go over the conversation so to make sure it's fully understood what's being said, watch people's body language and facial expressions. I went over that video pretty thoroughly and I am sticking with my assessment the woman was already dead when they came upon her, I am sticking with it appears there was a after death wound and highly likely they used the coagulated blood to make the insignia. You are entitled to your opinion on it, I just don't happen to agree with that opinion at the moment, mostly due to the body language and facial expressions of the guy being interviewed while observing the woman's body and insignia closely.
I don't think there was a rape involved. I think she was killed during the bombing, they didn't have time to bury her or the means to take her with them so they left her. I think she was dead for long enough for the blood to coagulate, the other side came upon her, lifted her clothing to expose her belly, stabbed her and used the blood to make the insignia. Go back and and look at the video again, look at the wound mark close to the insignia, it protrudes inwards, doesn't appear to be fresh blood but where the skin goes down in the wound it appears dried and dark.
The stab wound? Right side of her body next to the drawn insignia.
This is getting morbid. The woman's wound appears to protrude inwards, I'd say from the looks of it and that it's open they stuck the knife in more than once to keep getting the blood on the knife to draw the insignia.
Go back and listen carefully. He tells the reporter there was a dead woman down there. I thought she had possibly been raped but she wasn't left exposed in such a manner. Her leg positioning didn't suggest she had been raped either. There also wasn't any other apparent ripping of the clothing.
It's apparent it was a after death wound, there's no blood seen that ran from the wound down her belly or side, no blood splatter, no blood on the floor, no blood pooling anywhere.
They said she was stabbed. The stab mark is very clear on her belly, they even did a close up of it. Her face is clear, I thought it looked like she was holding a cloth to her face but on second examination her hands appear to be bond behind her back, at first I thought she was using it to hold the cloth to her face but further on when they show the other side up close you can clearly see that side indicates she is bound, you go back and look at the other side again and yes it appears that arm is also underneath her body. From one shot it looks like she is laying straight out but another appears to show a speck of white under a dark cloth that could be her other foot. There's still quite a bit of stuff between her legs but whatever, I guess it's anybody's guess as to if she was or wasn't, they don't mention it. I still doubt the insignia was drawn before she died because there just not enough evidence of blood. The only blood you see is the insignia and on her face.
The fact the wound is wider than just a straight in stab wound is why I think they had to keep inserting the knife to keep getting the blood on it because the blood was coagulated. Yes, the blood was already dried, but not like dried, dried as we would think of it, that's why they had to keep reinserting.
It appears pressure was asserted to one side of the wound. Probably caused by the pressure to try and get more blood on the knife. It's disturbing to say the least. Horrific really. Hateful, vile. Whoever did it doesn't deserve to roam the earth.
We are discussing, observing, not taking sides. No one is excusing anyone's behavior, that's part of my people mistakenly think you are when one person's opinion is different than another's. It doesn't make one right or wrong over the other.
You know I can't count the times I've heard people say "well I know it to be likely because it's been reported before as them doing these things".....my response is "yea, from all sides".
All sides have been reported as being involved in war crimes. There's no stone left unturned in that regard. You could have a hundred men standing around a woman like that but few if any would do such an atrocious thing. There's only two types of individuals who'd do such a thing, one driven crazy by the lose of a loved one in the violence of war or someone who should have never been allowed to walk the face of the earth to begin with. There's been reports from all sides of disbanding people from these various groups for being to far over the fringe, for the vast majority of people there really is a limit. It's one thing to be forced to defend yourself it's a whole other to do that which was done to this woman.
As a matter of fact it was reported they were incorporated into a policing position. That would be akin to letting the KKK police the subway system of New York.
No there's actually one group in the bunch called the C14, they are reportedly pretty bad, they are also speculated to be operatives of the CIA.