Hi, Really, I don't accept. It doesn't matter who the murderer was. He was murdered, and since then there has been an effort to clamp down on any honest assessment of Charlie Kirk's legacy. That is a valuable legacy, politically, to some people. I here assert my right to look at it, honestly. To question the orthodoxy. Who killed Charlie Kirk? That doesn't really affect my research. Even if it was the government (which is what some people will say), it's his legacy that is important, that needs honest appraisal.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: