Thank you for pointing that out. @agmoore seems to accept that the person of interest is guilty of the crime, but there is a great deal to cast doubt on that. That the FBI is the source of this pronouncement makes it even less likely to be true. They haven't even found the bullet, without which they can't prove the gun is the gun that murdered Kirk. The official, government sponsored and approved story, is largely bunk.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi, Really, I don't accept. It doesn't matter who the murderer was. He was murdered, and since then there has been an effort to clamp down on any honest assessment of Charlie Kirk's legacy. That is a valuable legacy, politically, to some people. I here assert my right to look at it, honestly. To question the orthodoxy. Who killed Charlie Kirk? That doesn't really affect my research. Even if it was the government (which is what some people will say), it's his legacy that is important, that needs honest appraisal.