It seems that they were right.
You plagiarise content.
https://hive.blog/hive-158694/@dawnoner/marie-full-spectrum-photographyphotographie-en-spectre-complet#@hivewatchers/rvstfb
So not even the post that your recycled was not original but stolen content.
LOL
Diffamation again :
Denigrating other people's work hidden behind your screen : yes you can!!!
Could you please quote where we mentioned anything about these photos being plagiarised or mentioning any content being plagiarised from any Mary?
If you are having difficulty reading the source we provided, here is a guide on how to do it, please:
"So not even the post that your recycled was not original but stolen content" : as I know the author (Marie HOUDIN) and she gave me authorization to use her text, this is defamation to say that I stole her work. It applies also for the pictures : as I am the author and I can prove it as I have the original RAW files, this is not stolen content.
So, yes, obviously you defamated me twice in the same sentence.
Don't take time to answer as I won't reply. I'm fed up with you guys as you lie all the time.
My question still stands : who watches you?!?!?
Please go back and read our comments again.