You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: to bot or not...?

in #hive-dev4 years ago

The principle meaning I try to act in a way, that I would like to see others act.
I am at a point where just grabbing every reward I can get and then redistributing it to my liking would be much more efficient than trying to convince people.

Also maybe don't take it so personal? Because personally if I was him I would have downvoted you based off your language towards me, but he isn't so it isn't personal at least for him?

When I am talking to a clearly intelligent individual and they try to win the argument by acting like they don't understand the simplest thing, that's my trigger; Usually I might act differently, but today I decided to not hold back.
The posts are to promote his witness and to get rewarded. Acting like profit did not even occur to him is so dishonest it just pisses me off. Same for that lady who acted like she worked for ocd just to make the world better or something. 'May I please ask what bothers you about me giving bread to the poor?' ...being all passive aggressive.
I'd rather get a downvote or get verbally insulted than having to deal with that type of crap.

Sort:  

Then you don't see a contradictory? I mean you can't say it is in my principle against this type of bot reward metric and then choose to join? But who says that it has to be a principle is against botting, but simply just treating people how you'd want to be treated hence you aren't going against your principles.

I'm rather confused I mean truth be told I don't know any of you nor care cause I'd still speak out my feelings regardless, but seems he addressed them. I think the issue is a lot of people try to turn things to arguments, but it should be more directed at clarity seeking and mutual understanding.

When I read his replies though it didn't sound as if profit didn't occur to him, but he stated if he wanted to purely farm he would have just posted more for the autovotes? I'm not gonna respond to that lady post, but yeah I've dealt with some of the same things and I dislike passive aggressive types also, that uses service as a front. How about just not dealing with it and muting such individuals? lol

I mean you can't say it is in my principle against this type of bot reward metric and then choose to join?

If I had joined in (and that was years ago), I could have had a lot more funds today, generating more leverage to achieve what I am trying. I don't want to be the guy critizising everybody else, while making no moves myself.

There is a contradiction alright; I just wanted to articulate the question and maybe get some answers in the comments, but I just ended up causing all sorts of trouble.

Reframe your thoughts then and don't see it as a principle thing you are breaking. That is where a firm belief comes from (Not saying you don't have one), but your principles seem to want to derive from a collective meritocracy standpoint (which is admirable) so do it and show people what your version of that looks like instead of disagreeing with how someone else achieves that...

Actually having this conversation has helped me... because I actually refrained from doing giveaways a lot and talking about strategies and gameplay, because I didn't want to influence prices. Now I am going to do it but at scale. I'm not even going to be doing it from bots but through relentless post of adding value to different communities and figuring out how to balance it all.
!PIZZA

I'm not gonna respond to that lady post, but yeah I've dealt with some of the same things and I dislike passive aggressive types also, that uses service as a front. How about just not dealing with it and muting such individuals? lol

So you think I'm passive aggressive & using OCD as some sort of front, @infinitytcg? What does that imply about your feelings on OCD as a whole? I'm especially curious, given your recent activity in the Discord server...

And after our past interactions, that you'd refer to me as "that lady" is especially disheartening.

No... @traciyork I think you misinterpreted my message. I have nothing but positive vibes from you and the initiatives I've seen. I just didn't want to respond to that part of his statements.

I'm just trying to relate to the author to express I understand his feelings and have dealt with such characters not that you are. I'd gladly reword that statement and you can pm me in discord how it should be written if you feel it gives people that vibe. I don't really filter and I'm not as articulated as others so I normally just type out my thoughts and feelings as such.

To be honest I'm quite new to OCD and just discovered it recently and gave it more thought after acidyo's initiative on gods unchained community.
I am or try to be active across all communities I take part in so I can figure out how to fit or correspond them to my future plans/teams and deciding on which to support moving forward.

Well I didn't want to write your name in such a dark topic as it probably then would associate you to my next comment? But I guess I could have as clarification, but I was just quoting the author by stating it in that way.
I think often times many could follow what stephen convey explains in his book "7 habits of highly people" In which he states seek first to understand, then to be understood.

I'm sorry if you felt that the comment was directed at you or I meant any offense. I don't refer to people as that guy or that lady but by their names nor am I the type to say anything behind someone's back without having had already said it to their face or public as that is just not in my character.
!LUV