RE: Follow Friday - Hivetacular

[chrisrice]

My idea is to automate blue checkmarks without acting as a middle man.

• Twitter acts as the middle man for blue checkmarks and is corrupt about it.

The verification I envision, will allow users to verify their @dbuzz / #HIVE account via Web2.

@adamada

Posted via D.Buzz

Comments

[chrisrice]

Then, 3rd party users could verify for themselves, if a user was legit, based on clicking on the blue check mark (or something similar) that would direct to the Web2 account used for verification.

• If @billgates verified w/a Web2 account of 5 followers, it's fake @steevc
  
  Posted via D.Buzz

[frankbacon]

Im infinitely MORE interested in Verification EARNED on D.BUZZ than i am in defending myself to Hivewatchers. For I need to be able to put THEM on a Watchlist. 🙏😎🥓👍
Technically speaking of course.

N F T

[chrisrice]

A big difference between @dbuzz and #HW, is that @nathansenn and I don't desire freedom or power over others.

• For HW it more or less seems like their main objective, or at the least, something they love and grovel in.

Decentralization > Centralization

Posted via D.Buzz

[adamada]

Yeah and the above case I did for myself. Do you think I was being authoritarian when I decided to check if the account was legit when it was part of the curating routine? HW has nothing to do with it.

[chrisrice]

I tried to backread a see your conversation, but from what I see, it looks like your comments are fine.

1. Communication on-chain for verification is more transparent than off-chain via Discord.

2. Better tools would make the process easier, and could be opt-in.
   
   Posted via D.Buzz