You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Follow Friday - Hivetacular

in #hive5 years ago

excellent time to bring up that vouching IS my best method... personally.
I'll vouch the parrent comment by @adamada (67) 6 hours ago

The vouching system is the most simplified form of decentralized verification. Seeing a lot of loopholes can be used against this system it really baffles me how dumb fucks would freely give their info on centralized social media platform to conform vs decentralized platforms where steps to verify can be done in minutes without a drama. Really lacking the proof of brain here.

@chrisrice and I broke ground on a method ... Everyone's OWN version of the BLUE CHECK can be brought to HIVE expediantly.

Here is a user who could possibly get a D.BUZZ check mark for doing certain verification Steps ... that follow THEIR free speech guildlines.

All else follows from here.

Screenshot 2021-06-04 1.52.42 PM.png

Sort:  

I just need to know if the owner of the account cross platform also uses the content posted on hive by acknowledging they know hive. Other sensitive info is unncessesary. Do you post on hive with x username? No? Have a good day. I think you confuse my own venture with HW that has a separate protocol of idk what, I'm just checking out for myself representing myself.

My idea is to automate blue checkmarks without acting as a middle man.

  • Twitter acts as the middle man for blue checkmarks and is corrupt about it.

The verification I envision, will allow users to verify their @dbuzz / #HIVE account via Web2.

@adamada

Posted via D.Buzz

Then, 3rd party users could verify for themselves, if a user was legit, based on clicking on the blue check mark (or something similar) that would direct to the Web2 account used for verification.

Im infinitely MORE interested in Verification EARNED on D.BUZZ than i am in defending myself to Hivewatchers. For I need to be able to put THEM on a Watchlist. 🙏😎🥓👍
Technically speaking of course.

IMG_20210529_065951_152.jpg

N F T

A big difference between @dbuzz and #HW, is that @nathansenn and I don't desire freedom or power over others.

  • For HW it more or less seems like their main objective, or at the least, something they love and grovel in.

Decentralization > Centralization

Posted via D.Buzz

Yeah and the above case I did for myself. Do you think I was being authoritarian when I decided to check if the account was legit when it was part of the curating routine? HW has nothing to do with it.

I tried to backread a see your conversation, but from what I see, it looks like your comments are fine.

  1. Communication on-chain for verification is more transparent than off-chain via Discord.

  2. Better tools would make the process easier, and could be opt-in.

    Posted via D.Buzz

Vouching cannot scale imo, it needs to be a seamless, automated process, without a human middle man imo.

Posted via D.Buzz

Can you verify thats me in the picture?

Can a robot?

Can I?

I would ask for your other social media account and go message you there just as I would usually do on my own. But if this is the only place you post then I would just leave it at that.

Well, if you had access to a @frankbacon Twitter account, one that had 1 million followers.

  • The main concern would be that the account created here, for the account there, was the same owner.

That's what's important, and our future solution will solve that.

Posted via D.Buzz