I pay $20 for ChatGPT, and I can use it on OpenCode without paying extra. I haven't tested Claude. Is it much more powerful?
Similar, depending on the situation at the time (compute, model quality etc.) one may be better than the other. Harnesses (like OpenCode) are regularly updated too which may result in different results even if using the same exact model.
I think that the proposal is great, but it's bad timing, I guess. Why not create the fund some other way? Why use the DHF?
Out of curiosity, how?
Author rewards, beneficiary rewards, witness rewards, there are many ways. Using the reward pool in general, that way we don't bring in extra inflation.
Many whales are mainly voting on things like the @hbdstabilizer, and it's getting a lot of rewards.
This is for the last few weeks:
https://peakd.com/@hbdstabilizer/activities
But then you're forcing one person (or a few persons) to pay for the project, technically, this is exactly what DHF is for.
I don't think hbdstabilizer is a good example though, all rewards (bonuses on top) hbdstabilizer receives goes back to the DHF anyways.
But this way, people can actually downvote if they do not agree.
Yeah, maybe not the best example, but my point is that there is enough power, even at this valuation, to cover that and more.
I think I will make a post to give more context.
To the same argument, people can simply not vote for the proposal if they disagree.
I'll get more feedback from the community before deciding if I will support or not.
And will talk with the Mantequilla Soft guys about it too.