Author rewards, beneficiary rewards, witness rewards, there are many ways. Using the reward pool in general, that way we don't bring in extra inflation.
Many whales are mainly voting on things like the @hbdstabilizer, and it's getting a lot of rewards.
This is for the last few weeks:
But then you're forcing one person (or a few persons) to pay for the project, technically, this is exactly what DHF is for.
I don't think hbdstabilizer is a good example though, all rewards (bonuses on top) hbdstabilizer receives goes back to the DHF anyways.
But this way, people can actually downvote if they do not agree.
Yeah, maybe not the best example, but my point is that there is enough power, even at this valuation, to cover that and more.
I think I will make a post to give more context.
To the same argument, people can simply not vote for the proposal if they disagree.
I'll get more feedback from the community before deciding if I will support or not.
And will talk with the Mantequilla Soft guys about it too.