Quality is a relative concept.
I don't believe any post creates real value for the blockchain, regardless of the author's reputation.
I see more value creation coming from more responsible projects, more swaps, more apps—in short, more developers and ecosystem growth. I also don't think it's about simply adding more people at any cost.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I just disagree.
HIVE is social media. The quality of the content and the quality of the conversations does impact the valuation. Just like every other form of social media.
I accept that quality influences the rating of a post or comment by those who vote on it (including dislikes).
But I don't believe that the quality of posts supports the value of Hive as a cryptocurrency. Its value depends on supply and demand, and the discussion is primarily about the future.