No. Highly unreasonable is the right description.
The only reason why there is even a talk about this is because WE GOT LISTED.
We got listed because of the actions of the community.
If she asked for 30k for the same amount of work (or even for more work) and exchanges didnt list us, people would have told her to bugger off.
So really, shes not asking to get payed for her work. Shes asking to get payed for the results.
And the results are NOT her doing. They are OUR doing.
This kind of work is either voluntary or is payed like 1000$ a month at best. Its basically secretary work.
If she wasnt popular this would never pass. Its the reason no one else made this proposal except her that was involved
No one outside the "secret" group, outside the people that had insider knowledge could have got the job. 1 guy that wanted it was even kicked and told he was too greedy for asking for 100$ a day and shes asking for $500.
Oh and youre saying we should give her money because shes a girl? Fuck off with that neofeminist shit.
You keep throwing that around a lot.. you got proof of that?
Also math is helpful.. he wanted $100 a day, full time ( $36,500yr in a 3mth rolling contract). This was only for his role though, for sending the initial emails. He wanted to build a team, me included as he didn’t want to do the full workload to get a listing .. and pay us all this ($30k each x 4 = $120k). As “the exchange listings were going to take 6mths to a year”. I didn’t think money should be asked for before work was done. I also saw no need for a full time team on it. It was short term work.. get the initial big listings. Full time team was wasteful, especially when it could be done by fewer. (Mine is for $500/day as it’s for past and future work.. so over 160 days of work makes that $250/day for the work done. I got it done quicker, with fewer people, no need to pay me for a full year. Which I’ve told you and you repeatedly ignore as it doesn’t fit your agenda.)
I also didn’t like that he stated he got the Bittrex listing as a reasoning of why he should be paid (Gandalf did that and saying otherwise was bs). I also stated I would support his proposal at a later time (this was in March). Never once did I call him greedy and I didn’t kick him. The group stated they didn’t want to do proposals too soon as we needed to actually get some shit done first. It wasnt me scolding him, it was the group saying they wouldn’t support his proposal. That’s it.
He was kicked over a week later for not responding and starting a Steem witness where he started running the JS fork code and publicly asking him for a vote.
So please, get your damn story straight or stfu.
Civil discourse is great, isn't it? Disagreement is NORMAL and NEEDED in a decentralized world. But so is politeness and respect for someone with a dissenting viewpoint.
I was simply saying she is courageous in the boysy crypto world. NOT same as saying she gets paid cos she's a girl. Read again. I think she - and others deserve to be paid for an excellent job which has already borne measurable results, and will continue to do so. Results that have saved the community a small fortune and which will enable us all to excel.
Her having or not having courage has nothing to do with crypto being or not being a "boys world". There is a fair amount of women in crypto in important spots. Ciara Sun is an example. Our two biggest influencers on Hive are women.
If anything its easier for a girl to get noticed because of the significant presence of incels in crypto, especially on twitter, which some women do take advantage of some times.
Neo-feminist nonsense gets on my nerves.
Go see which tweets tend to get the most upvotes from female crypto influencers.
Id sooner say Justine is courageous to write the proposal she did asking for 30k then for being a girl in crypto.😂