I agree with you on the fact that we need to re-align the witness votes and that currently we do not have any probable threats (maybe I should have started with that).
Regarding the number of votes and stuff, @raycoms did an analysis recently and I've seen numbers for other models too. Nothing would really improve the situation, as anything goes in two directions - if it's easier for the community to prevent a supermajority, a big stakeholder can also block hardforks easier. In the end stake is defining and the only real security measure is a good distribution so buying amounts big enough to be a threat is unreasonably expensive.
I don't disagree. For now let's leave it at that and thank you again.