As we have discussed a few times some of these types of abuse are debatable. I think the guiding principle that each post should be mostly original content. If it includes something you did before then there should be enough to make it something new. Where the threshold lies is up to those viewing it. You should also be honest and up-front if there is any copying or repetition. Trying to hide it will make people suspicious.
I see HW refer to 'copypasta'. I guess that's an in-joke.
I have said a few times that there should be an element of forgiveness. Some cases are honest mistakes due to lack of awareness of what is expected and people should be given a chance without making them beg. Repeat offenders are something else.
There is something about this on the main Hive site.
!PIZZA
So I tried very hard to make this non-confrontational it is a genuine offer for HW's FAQ because I believe, as you pointed out, a lot of the transgressions are mistakes that, to be honest, NOBODY tells them about. I mean, think about it. You get a notification that you've done something wrong me personally; I would go to Hivewatchers website, find out what the rules are, and yet there's fook all on there apart from "Hey! Wanna report somebody?" is that the way to promote Hive? I think not. It's almost like the omission of a guide and an FAQ is a deliberate ploy to allow people to fall foul through ignorance?
They need to get this into lots of languages too. I'm sure there are people who could do that.
!BEER
Gasp! That's post farming! 🤣🤣🤣
Did I say it should be posts? You can decline rewards on dupes of course.
Yeah, that should be acceptable.
You need to stake more BEER (24 staked BEER allows you to call BEER one time per day)