As I have spent time on the web – which has been since the 1980’s – I have seen a lot of walls o’ text. People write and write and write and never hit the “enter” key. And there I am, trying to wade through a deep ocean of text.
As I struggle to keep track of where I’m at in the wall, with minor distractions happening often enough that I have to comb through the paragraph to find where I left off, I cringe.
This is frustrating, and any added distraction that breaks trains of thought perforce makes Me do the combing. And even if there is no distraction, trying to maintain My eyes at the right place on the wall is sometimes challenging. Needless to say…
I loathe walls o’ text. Haha!
So… I thought I would offer what I was taught…50+ years ago…to all the writers of both articles and comments. I am hoping to eradicate walls o’ text! LOL! What I was taught was this:
As a rule, start a new paragraph after every two to four sentences. With one sentence breaks on points One would like to stress every two to five paragraphs. In this way, the reader has a brief rest to process what was said, and important points stand out. And maintaining awareness of where One left off is far easier!
Yes, if the sentences are short, five or six can be contained in a paragraph, but that should be a rarity, not a rule.
Here’s an example. I took this text from an article of Mine called Arresting the Homeless (linked below). I took out the returns:
There is nothing unEthical about being homeless. Things done by the homeless may or may not be unEthical, but not having a roof over One’s head to call home is not. It does not break any of the three Laws of Ethics. If I have no home, but do not defraud, steal, sabotage, torture or kill, I am doing nothing wrong. And surely, if I could I would have a home. Indeed, 99.9% of the homeless would have a home if life had been better to Them. But in any system that accounts for the energy Each adds into the system (with “money” in any form, from trade/barter items to anything representational), ensuring everyOne adds Their “fair share” of energy, Most will be poor, and there will be Those who cannot pay for even food, let alone a home. And psychopaths will sit at the top. Money systems will promote Them there, for They are the Ones who will do literally anything to get the most for the power over Others money provides. Any who think arresting People for being forced into homelessness by the moneyed system clearly lack compassion. And that is the tell of a psychopath. They are incapable of caring, compassion, love, or empathy for Others. And to rich psychopaths, the homeless are like a flea infestation. Annoying and something to get rid of. “Make Them work! To Our profit!”
Compare getting through that to reading it with the returns I used:
There is nothing unEthical about being homeless.
Things done by the homeless may or may not be unEthical, but not having a roof over One’s head to call home is not. It does not break any of the three Laws of Ethics.
If I have no home, but do not defraud, steal, sabotage, torture or kill, I am doing nothing wrong. And surely, if I could I would have a home. Indeed, 99.9% of the homeless would have a home if life had been better to Them.
But in any system that accounts for the energy Each adds into the system (with “money” in any form, from trade/barter items to anything representational), ensuring everyOne adds Their “fair share” of energy, Most will be poor, and there will be Those who cannot pay for even food, let alone a home.
And psychopaths will sit at the top. Money systems will promote Them there, for They are the Ones who will do literally anything to get the most for the power over Others money provides.
Any who think arresting People for being forced into homelessness by the moneyed system clearly lack compassion. And that is the tell of a psychopath. They are incapable of caring, compassion, love, or empathy for Others. And to rich psychopaths, the homeless are like a flea infestation. Annoying and something to get rid of.
“Make Them work! To Our profit!”
I do not doubt that You can see the advantage of breaking the wall o’ text into much smaller blocks. It is far easier to read along in comfort when the mind can rest and reflect ever so briefly as One moves to the next paragraph, and offers an identifiable place to return to if a distraction crops up.
Anyway, now that I got that off My chest, I will return to the goal of My work: to free Humanity from the slavery that requires the accounting for the energy We add into a system in order that We can “afford to live.” That practice is archaic and very detrimental to Our race here on Our planet.
It keeps Us from the wealth that is Ours.
See the links below for ways We can bring Our planet’s abundance to everyOne, with poverty eliminated. And wage slavery eradicated.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
Arresting the Homeless (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/arresting-the-homeless
You Are a Multimillionaire (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/you-are-a-multimillionaire
80% of Us Merely Move Money (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/80percent-of-us-merely-move-money
Why Money is Not in Your Best Interest (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/why-money-is-not-in-your-best-interest
Have You Ever Paid AnyOne in Attention? (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/have-you-ever-paid-anyone-in-attention
Abolition of Money (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/abolition-of-money
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.