Everything You Know

Everything You Know Graphic.png

Because I assign probabilities of truth to data I receive, not labeling things in My mind, “True,” or “False,” on that day, forty-someodd years ago, when a man approached Me at a science fiction convention and said, “Everything You know is wrong,” I said, “Okay…” and gave low probability to the statement, rejoining the conversation I had been in.  The man withdrew and left.

This was long before any band made an album with that as a title.

It was such an odd experience that it stuck well through the years, and every so often I would take the idea out, dust it off, and look to see if it explained what I saw.  For many years, I tucked it back with about the same low probability of truth.  And life went on as normal.

Then, in 1999, I learned of the horrendous cost to society, in terms of government spending, ruined lives, broken families, and prison costs, that having a seed of a plant was creating.  I had much experience with the plant such a seed produces, and knew that there was nothing at all to fear – never did grasp why it was forbidden in the legalates*.  So I did some due diligence.

I discovered that the plant threatened many industries back in the 1930’s.  William Randolph Hearst, publisher, had much invested in paper forests and hemp threatened that.  Rockefeller’s budding pharmaceutical companies were threatened by its wide array of health benefits (“recreational use” is relieving stress, and so, a medical application), wanting to quash any natural competition, and His oil companies were threatened by hemp oil – Henry Ford made a car that ran on hemp oil.  The cotton industry was threatened too by hemp, and there were others that were threatened in one way or another.

The paychecks for prisons were going away with prohibition’s end, and Harry Anslinger, who was in charge of enforcing it, needed something else to go after…  All that came together to rob Us of a most beneficial plant.

I had not seen the psychopathic elements until I looked at why the plant was vilified and *legalates (“the “laws” in the legal system that are not Laws, but acts, mandates, codes, regulations, &c.) were created to get Us to accept the bullying of Ones who wanted this medicine, since We consent to that system.

When I dusted the idea that everything I knew was wrong of its mothballs, the probabilities that it was true rose.  But surely the idea did not warrant much increase on this one issue.  So back it was tucked.  And normal persisted.

Still, I pondered things.  A great deal I was told did not explain what I saw.  I the critters living without washing their paws, while walking in stuff I had been told was stuff that would make Me sick, even licking places that, on My body, I was told would make Me sick if I did that.  Illness was rare in these creatures I share the planet with.

And then the contention between Béchamp and Pasteur came to light, and the tests the military did.  Neither Béchamp nor the military could prove contagion (in fact, it has never been proven), despite having hundreds of the well subjected to the sick, who coughed, sneezed and spat into Their mouths.  Despite mucus being taken from the sick and swabbed in Their nasal passages.  Despite even having both the blood and the mucus of the sick injected into Their bodies.  Zero of the well got sick.  Pasteur wrote in His posthumously published journals that He added toxins to His work to “prove” contagion.

And oh, the stories of John D. Rockefeller…  With His fingers in everything – oil, publishing, schools of medicine (and schools in general), research, media...and pharmaceuticals.  What profit and control He had going!  When I took out that idea that everything I knew was wrong…  Well, I could see that the probabilities were much higher.  I had “known” that deadly viruses abounded, but now…  I can see why the Ones who claim there’s no such thing as contagion or deadly viruses are being censored off the big web media sites.

What damage to the plans, that utilize the idea of deadly viruses to create fear and compliance, the data on Béchamp did was minimal.  The information about Him and His work was not taught in the Rockefeller-controlled “education” (indoctrination) system.

The idea that everything I knew was wrong jumped in probability, and I set it on a closer shelf far less dusty.

Then I discovered that the controlmind (“government”) is a for-profit corporation!  All the controlminds on the planet are for-profit corporations – and owned by a small group.  It became clear that “elections” were merely an illusion that We had any say, keeping Us consenting to the corporate rule.  What corporation is going to let Jo(e) Public choose its officers, including (but not limited to) the CEO (president)?

That idea surged in probability of truth, the bit of dust well removed, and a very close shelf was now its home.  I now had three strong pointers to things that I “knew” that were wrong.  And then…  9/11 happened.

Right from the get-go, I had questions about the “official story.”  Story, indeed.  Nothing of what We were told added up to the evidence.  Too many “coincidences” – the put options on only the airlines involved, the gold missing from where it had been kept in one of the towers, the military flight data showing flights but offset to the ones on “public” radar readings by about 1,000 feet (with the technology to project a hologram that distance admitted openly).  The “artists” photographed in one tower with explosives in stacked boxes, the many pages of the “Patriot Act" passed weeks after (it would take years to compile all the changes listed in that legalate)…

The list is long of anomalies surrounding that day that all point to, as They say, an inside job.  A planned operation.  An operation with an agenda attached.  The idea was now sitting on the very front shelf, probability of being correct well above 50%.

There have been other things which We have been told, the “history” of Humankind on this planet, for one.  The megalithic works point to several surges of high technology wiped out.  The skeletons of giants found and then vanishing into the vaults of the Smithsonian.  Many “out-of-place artifacts” – or OOPART’s – found all over the planet.  The pyramidal structures also found on all continents.

And yet…  A boring story is told of cavemen before about 10,000 years ago when all of a sudden We started out of the caves and onto a ramp up to where We are today.  I “knew” this was the story growing up.  But evidence is clearly pointing to that having been wrong.  Another thing, at the time that man told Me that everything I knew was wrong, that He was right about.  I do ponder why They hide Our true history…

The list is longer still, but the point, I think, has been made.  The one thing I determined was not wrong of the things I once “knew:”  Our planet is a globe.  They had to tell the truth on this, because shipping and transportation – things They make fortunes off of – require the truth to function.  If the map is wrong, time estimates, fuel costs, and locations all will be wrong, and the commerce system could not function.  There are other facts that point to a globe, but that alone stands to show that We have a globe.

But, for virtually everything else, We are not given the truth.

And now, We see the crown bug invasion, the corona (crown) virus (bug) pandemic (invasion), and, with all I know, it is clear this is the pinnacle of all the lies They tell Us.  Given contagion is a fallacy, given the profits for many a major corporation (while minor ones and small businesses are failing), and the ingredients of the jabs They’re selling – which appear to be designed to invade Our bodies and change Us into Beings that can be electronically controlled – it is clear this is a global move to control Humanity 100%.

So much for life going back to normal.

Why would all these things be so different from what I “knew?”  The explanation is (and followers of My work will know) We have psychopaths in control on Our planet putting on a play and selling it to Us as “reality.”  And We have a choice.

Consent to Their systems and “reality,” or walk away from it all and construct better.  Both are scary, one passive and one active, and for Me?  I’m vastly more fearful of the first option.  My question to You is:  which of the options scares You more?  If it is the latter, walking away and constructing better, then You have no need of My work.  You are part of the problem, maintaining the “reality,” where They are in control and We become robots of flesh – if We survive.

If, on the other hand, walking away, withdrawing consent, from Their legal/governmental system, getting free energy out so We can stop accounting for Ours (live richly with no need for money), where We care about problems and Ethically solve for them without the concern of whether there’s enough money to do it, where teachers are revered for sharing Their knowledge, earning fame and students who want to hear what They have to say, where communities blossom of interests They all have in common, be it being a family, music, theatre, farming, art, religion, science, or…the list is long...

If You don’t want what They’re selling and do want freedom within Ethics, and are looking for what You can do to make Our planet an enormous amount better, then My work is for You.  The best thing You can do to help is share awareness that We can withdraw Our consent from Their mess, consent to the three Laws of Ethics (natural Law expressed as the three things not to do), and construct so very much better than what the psychopaths are creating around Us.

Share a vision of what We can build for Humanity on Our planet.

And if You are in a position to do these things, bring it on!

1.  Experiment with free energy tech and share successes freely – this is about removing money use, not making it

2.  Build an open-source web with no central backbone for control

3.  Build a site to report problems on with an emergency reporting section

4.  Build an app that alerts People of the emergencies reported

I offer a number of the videos I have created with details on many aspects of how We will live, how We will maintain order – not that there will be much motive at all to disrupt things – the three Laws of Ethics, and the blueprint for Our truly free and Ethical society.  Some are older, and I had bad locations, a very crappy mic, and other issues, so the sound is not the best, and My more recent vids have had My vocals sped up by about 25% (Many told Me I speak too slowly…  LOL!), and I am far more practiced with reading My own writing (Others’ writings I’m pretty good with, but I struggled at first reading My own stuff).  They are on Odysee because, try as I might, I can’t seem to upload to 3Speak:

Free Energy:

Electrogravitics:  Gravity Control & Energy from the Aether:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/electrogravitics-gravity-control-energy:6

The Blueprint:

I Have a Blueprint:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/i-have-a-blueprint:1

The Detailed Blueprint:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-detailed-blueprint-vocal-redo:9

Other videos – most under 10 minutes:

I-AM Sovereign:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/i-am-sovereign-6-minute-video:6

Foundational Rights:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/foundational-rights:e

Trusts:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/trusts:0

Is Money Evil?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/is-money-evil:9

Self Defense and Ethics:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/self-defense-and-ethics:1

Imagine an Alien Civilization:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/imagine-an-alien-civilization-12-minute:d

Morality and Ethics:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/morality-and-ethics:e

Why Littering Is UnEthical:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/why-littering-is-unethical:c

UBI:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/ubi:d

Voluntaryism:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/voluntaryism-5-minute-video:2

Who Controls Social Credit?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/who-controls-social-credit:f

Solutocracy:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/solutocracy:c

The Rules of Anarchy:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-rules-of-anarchy-8-minute-video:8

Who's Responsible?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/who-s-responsible:0

Free Being:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/free-being:f

Do You Have the Balls?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/do-you-have-the-balls:5

Unite...And Then What?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/unite-and-then-what:1

Cashless vs. Moneyless:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/cashless-vs-moneyless:a

The Rules of Anarchy:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-rules-of-anarchy-8-minute-video:8

What Shall We Call "Them?":  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/what-shall-we-call-them-3-minute-video:b

Why I Am This Unspeakable Thing:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/why-i-am-this-unspeakable-thing-5:8

Radical Problems:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/radical-problems:0

Morality and Ethics:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/morality-and-ethics:e

The Money Push:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-money-push:d

Would You Be Happier? - Censored Off YouToilet:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/would-you-be-happier:e

Collectively or Aggregately?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/collectively-or-aggregately-4-minute:b

Never Believe ANYTHING!:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/never-believe-anything:5

My Mother Sat Me Down:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/my-mother-sat-me-down-a-future:f

The GentleOne's Solution:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-gentleone-s-solution-7-minute-video:4

Do We Want Fluoride in Our Water?:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/do-we-want-fluoride-in-our-water:d

Radical Problems:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/radical-problems:0

An Ethical Sovereign Stands on Ethical Grounds:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/an-ethical-sovereign-stands-on-ethical:9

The Snake and the Rod:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/the-snake-and-the-rod:d

Censorship:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/censorship:c

Abundancism:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/abundancism:8

Planetary Problem:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/planetary-problem:3

You Can Have That Government – But You Can’t Have Me!:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/you-can-have-that-government-but-you-can:9

Earn A Living:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/earn-a-living:6

Radical Problems:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/radical-problems:0

An Unpopular Position - Crypto:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/an-unpopular-position-crypto-9-minute:1

An Ethical Sovereign Stands on Ethical Grounds:  https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/an-ethical-sovereign-stands-on-ethical:9

Take membership in the Society Of Ethical Sovereigns (SOES):

To All Who Seek To Better Our Planet

My Playlists:

Amaterasu Solar:

Amaterasu Solar Again:




Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar

My father taught Me never to believe anything.  He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data.  He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on YouTube).  From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw.  So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles.  I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics.  I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY.  Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY.  We were accounting for Our energy input into things.  And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too.  And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths.  Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene.  Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked...  If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them?  I think You can figure out what answer I came up with.  And would that explain what I see?  Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy.  If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather...  I am a conspiracy analyst.  And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound.  That explains perfectly what I see.

Love always.


The things that we are taught, that are false, is very long.

Histroy, of course.
English, who knew?
Science? Surely not science?!! It's... scientific.

But science and math are both taught in a way that you will never know they are broken, and will never look for the truth.

Why is Einstein placed on a pedestal, and Tesla considered a hack?
When, if you put them side by side, with what they actually did, Einstein is a fuzzy haired crackpot, and we owe our modern world to Tesla.

If you start with the assumption that everything you know is wrong...
how do you start to learn what is correct?

I have demolished and reconstructed the foundation of my thinking several times.
(I am really tired of that)

Of course, i am much better and far clearer thinking now... but the price...

Ah, yes, the physics. I thought to add that, but the article was getting longish... LOL! Indeed, Einstein was given the "theories" and used to push them as "truth" because they did not predict the energy in the aether. Tesla indeed was awesome, and much ignored in the Rockefeller "education." Another good One is Dr. Paul A. LaViolette whose counter theory to the einsteinian bunk, subquantum kinetics (SQK) predicts that energy and the Biefeld-Brown effect (which wikislimia says is "ion wind," despite its being orders of magnitude greater than anything ion wind can account for) which draws on it. They greatest thing about SQK beyond its predicting all the "mysteries" in einstinia is that it is euclidean! No "bending of spacetime" crap.

I start with the assumption that I can never know 100% if anything is true - there's always the possibility I do not have all the data - and ask if any data explain what I see. The more it explains, the higher the probability it is true. When new data come in, that better explain what I see, I adjust My probabilities. So it's not so much "demolishing and reconstructing" as it is not having emotional attachments to anything being true (or false).

It's that emotional attachment that trips so Many up in accepting a different view.