You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Remember when @Blocktrades explained how a fork is not theft and you ate that shit up like it was candy?

But Mr. Tron said he didn't do it.
He, nor steemit, worked on the HF.

Soooo, even if it was theft, Mr. Tron didn't do it... (he said so)

It is really hard to not look at this as theft.
However, the correct wording would be there are now three chains.

Steem(old) Steem(justin) & HIVE

Steem(old) has lost server support, and is no longer really functioning.

So, we have Steem(justin) & HIVE left.

And so, we have securities fraud... but we also have no legal recourse that will gain anything.
And that is the way of distributed blockchains.

Sort:  

I'm trying to figure out how it's not theft, but it is securities fraud.

Because its backwards.

The STEEM is still there in all servers running HF-22

And, if those steemians still wanted that steem, they could go run servers to support HF-22
However the servers who mean anything are all running HF-23

So, there is three blockchains. STEEM (old), STEEM (justin), HIVE

So, the same thing that HIVE did, fork the chain and start their own servers
is what Justin did, fork the chain and start his own servers.

The only thing confusing is that Justin kept the name "STEEM"
So, everyone is confused that STEEM(old) had steem in those accounts, and STEEM(justin) doesn't, so it was a theft.

What is more appropriate to say is that the STEEM you knew is now DEAD!

Thanks. Mind if I highlight your response on my show this afternoon? at 4pm mst

Sorry, i do not know your show. I do not get to watch much video (internets problems).

I said the thing as clearly as i could, trying to convey the truth as i see it, and as such will like it to go to as many people who also want to hear it.