Oddly, Trump will forever have the stain of impeachment. I’d love to be a fly on the wall next November when he realizes he’s not getting a second term and will be indicted as soon as he leaves office.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Oddly, Trump will forever have the stain of impeachment. I’d love to be a fly on the wall next November when he realizes he’s not getting a second term and will be indicted as soon as he leaves office.
You will be very disapointed when he gets the next term then.
Please read the post, then tell my what crime he is being charged with. 100% of what they are claiming he did, is actually his Job, as POTUS! Conbine that with the Fact that he did Not do what they claimed he did (I read the transcript, you should too), and they are wrong twice.
If you manage to find a crime, you are doing better than your liberal politicians have done. They admit there is no crime here!
These constant attacks are intended to delay prosecution for real crimes done by liberals, who thought they would have protection from prosecution by the Whitehouse in 2016.
As far as the stain of Impeachment, this travssty will ensure victory for President Trump! Any stain will rest where it belongs, on the liberals who ignored their oath of office; and voted for this sham, based entirely on perjury and innuendo!
24% of the people at the Florida Trump rally, were registered Democrats, and 5% were Democrats that had not voted in the last four elections! People are tired of your lies, and are leaving in droves, seeking honesty.
People that think, are basically fair and honest. They saw the heart of the socialist party In this railroad impeachment job, and they don't want what you are selling!!!
Wake up....
:'(I find it amusing that so many people claim to have read the transcript when no transcript has ever been released. A redacted reconstruction was released but even it says right there on the PDF clear as day “This is not a transcript.”
EVERY government communication is redacted for classified information, DUH! That does not affect the conversation that was NOT classified where The Ukrainian President brought up this problem and ask for help with it.
This was needed, because our Ambassador Refused to do her job, and pass on the information to the DOJ!
https://steemit.com/informationwar/@smithlabs/us-ambassador-yovanovitch-perjured-herself-and-denied-visa-to-witnesses-to-obstruct-justice-and-protect-other-liberals
It also amazes me that liberals take as gospel testamony from someone that was not involved, who quoted what he heard from a second individual. It turns out that the second person was NOT on the call either! This is hearsay of hearsay, and ONE level is not considered evidence in any court!
Except maybe the Kangaroo court that Schiff set up, I call BS! When the Senate does their Job, and checks the legal accuracy of the "Crime" under Constitutional Law, it will die the death it deserves....
This will haunt the DNC in next years election! Ironically, if they had not gone nuclear with perjury on Kavanaugh, they would not have lost the Senate seats they need now!
Perjury is becoming less effective as a political tool, as voters understand that they are minions of the Father of all lies; and the only thing they have to offer is lies supported by lies....
When this is shown to be the feces it is, we should Bill the DNC for the $46,000,000.00 they wasted, knowing there was Nothing from the start! They knew they were wasting this money and time, so billing them is fair....
>:(As a wild guess, a few decades from now you’ll probably still be fuming at how unkind history has been to Donald J Trump.
I have no idea where Trump supporters came up with the idea that Articles of Impeachment are supposed to have any relationship to the criminal code.
If anything, Trump got off easy with only two Articles of Impeachent. Andrew Johnson’s 10th Article reads like it could have been written with Trump in mind:
“That said Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, unmindful of the high duties of his high office and the dignity and proprieties thereof, and of the harmony and courtesies which ought to exist and be maintained between the executive and legislative branches of the Government of the United States, designing and intending to set aside the rightful authorities and powers of Congress, did attempt to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach, the Congress of the United States, and the several branches thereof, to impair and destroy the regard and respect of all the good people of the United States for the Congress and the legislative power thereof, which all officers of the government ought inviolably to preserve and maintain, and to excite the odium and resentment of all good people of the United States against Congress and the laws by it duly and constitutionally enacted; and in pursuance of his said design and intent, openly and publicly and before divers assemblages of citizens of the United States, convened in divers parts thereof, to meet and receive said Andrew Johnson as the Chief Magistrate of the United States, did, on the eighteenth day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-six, and on divers other days and times, as well before as afterwards, make and declare, with a loud voice, certain intemperate, inflammatory and scandalous harangues, and therein utter loud threats and bitter menaces, as well against Congress as the laws of the United States duly enacted thereby, amid the cries, jeers and laughter of the multitudes then assembled in hearing, which are set forth in the several specifications hereinafter written...”
What amazes me is that you haven't read the Constitution. It is SPECIFIC, that a Crime has to occur to Impeach. That is why the check of teh Senate to Verify said crime was put in place. Ignorance is a poor place to live....
It also surprises me that President Trump is not guilty of crimes someone else did over a century ago. It shouldn't surprise me, but it does. In the grand scheme of things, I guess he is as "guilty of those 'crimes'; as the current articles!
YOU CAN NOT Impeach a President, just because you hate him, THAT is just Not there!
:)>Yes, I have.
No, it doesn’t.
You keep claiming that things which are not facts are facts. I see no point in continuing this thread.
You need to read it again...But be careful, you start thinking and you will become a Conservative, LOL!.
Even that Idiot Pelosi Knows there is nothing here. She has painted herself into a corner, and is trying to withhold the Articles of Impeachment from the Senate! She has realized that they will verify Facts of these Articles. She knows this will finish the process; as there is Nothing there!
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/12/19/cruz-dems-in-a-panic-because-in-the-last-month-their-case-collapsed/
Here is a synopsis on High Crimes Etc. From the Constitution Society
https://constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm
THEY say there Must be a crime! But I guess you are smarter than these guys too....
Sorry both Articles are Crap, to be flushed by the Senate.
:)>