If Ned leaves it will be incredible news for Steemit but more importantly the Steem blockchain. Have you not noticed that anything cool built into the Steem blockchain has been created by people not affiliated with STINC?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That's blatantly false. We need a credibility rating next to reputation.
I completely agree. A credibility rating would be awesome. Maybe you guys can add it to the roadmap with “coming soon>>” just like everything else. . . Wonder how STINC would rank in credibility?
The Steem blockchain is actually one of the best, however it’s success is going to have nothing to do with the efforts of STINC. . .
Glad to hear it! Hopefully our pitching in at least is not in vain. Personally I was thinking SMTs were going to be a big deal. But we shall see!
Were or ARE?
Freudian slip?
That was giving Rawdawg’s comment some sarcasm.
SMTs are going to be the Oxygen of the crypto world. While everyone seems to be doing OK and having fun huffing proverbial helium — we will need Oxygen to survive.
Also, lay off the drugs. For real, nobody believes this shit.
Actions speak louder than words @ned, and so far, we’ve seen absolutely nothing. Talk is cheap.
All we want as investors in Steem, both finacial and time/effort wise, is a clear non-poetic response to why you have been powering down in a mostly down market. Can't you at least create some hype behind your power down? There is green everywhere in crypto but with Steem. It seems investors might be hesitant to buy with our CEO powering down for no real clear reason. Would you recommend for people to buy Steem as your powering down? What is up duder? @ned
I'm more of a Nitrous Oxide kinda guy
Steemit sucks and all you have done is recreate America's Crony Capitalist Oligarchy( not to be confused with Free Market Capitalism). Bots have replaced personal interaction and your balance dictates the weight of your voice, rather than one person one equal voice. Steemit will become a sharing platform of original content created elsewhere, because it is not truly user friendly, it doesn't give back power to the people, the search function sucks, content has a very short earning lifespan, most content is junk, the platform has minimal features AND IS NOT DECENTRALIZED. I SUPPORT THE IDEALS OF DAN LARIMER, BUT YOU ARE A CROOK, @ned.
I see a huge amount of users leaving the platform for platforms, which do not pay them. This only makes sense if Steemit sucks and is short on Social in Social Media.
I could go on, but this will suffice. Go ahead and flag this if you like...I am powering down anyway😜
Did you even read the SMT paper?
My ideals will prevail.
Pursuing Opportunity for all who will contribute from their passions.
We can do this with One person, one vote, as well as with many competing Proof of Brain tokens of various emissions mechanics. And 1P1V is possible. As I discuss in the SMT paper.
I did not succeed in creating a balanced system, nor one of 1P1V, the first time, but now I will.
The SMT Coding Bunker is full all next week. Development is On!
Hi @ned . Is there any plans to mitigate voting-bots? Is a blockchain captcha (or something like that) even possible?
I ask that based on blue & white papers, which show a strong commitment to the value of Human Curation.
b.b.
Who made those "bots?"
Hi @ned ..
Have you guys published official timelines for SMT dev milestones ...maybe on steemit blog ?