Sort:  

Just so we're clear you're talking about @RichardHeartWin on Twitter, right?

The guy who's Twitter profile states:

Richard doesn't read messages, email, newspapers, magazines, letters, communication of any form or listen to the radio or nearly anything else. Stay Humble.

Yet somehow without reading messages or "communication of any form" he upvotes tweets, replies to tweets, tweets out opinions about current events even though his profile claims he isn't paying any attention to any kinds of media that would inform him of those current events.

Seems like his profile is one huge lie. If his Twitter profile might be a huge lie then his "good trackrecord" may also be falsified. If the guy's own profile can't be honest then what other deceptions are there from him?

I think that's the largest problem with this post you wrote. Your only knowledgebase is a cryptocurrency scammer that has swindled you and you haven't figured out yet that you've been one of his useful idiots.

No, the only thing obvious is that you are trying to read words that aren't there and ignoring the words that are actually in the scammer's profile.

Lasse: "Richard Heart has a good track record."

Lasse's source when asked: "Dude, trust me bro. Richard Heart says he has a good track record."

So Richard Heart rugpulling CFD token wasn't a practice run before the real scam?

Now will you finally come to the realization that you fell for a scam and apologize for promoting it?

HEX Price Plunges as SEC Sues Richard Heart for Securities Fraud

https://u.today/hex-price-plunges-as-sec-sues-richard-heart-for-securities-fraud

I'd say read the court filing but...Yeah, you'd just see words like "unincorporated" and exclaim, "THAT'S NOT A REAL WORD! WORDS DON'T HAVE MORE LETTERS THAN I HAVE FINGERS!"

Anyway, if you actually did what a "crypto expert" would do and actually read the primary source (the SEC court filing) you'd see that it's Richard Heart (or whatever alias the scammer is using today) being sued.

Maybe you should check out Baby's First Cryptocurrency Book from the library again for a refresher? Not telling you to read the same book twice. Just a question.