I agree on the content. LBI get decent earnings and 50/50 sounds pretty fair.
There's little they can do with CUB, the only thing they can do is launch another one. LBI has zero influence with Khal, he knows LBI exists but has never dropped a comment on any post. Well, 1 post when i wrote about LEO's 45% inflation for 2022.
So bHBD are not pegged to 1 HBD? I never knew about that.
Thanks for your feedback, i wish i had 20 other investors like you in LBI.
Me neither, until I read this post by @lordbutterfly
https://hive.blog/hive-167922/@lordbutterfly/splinterlands-dao-500k-hbd-purchase-proposal-not-passing
Despite docs at Cubdefi.com still claiming it's pegged 1:1. When I contacted the team they all claimed hbd gets repegged when new MTB will be set up.
I don't think this is how how SocialFi should look like. LBI is a major stakeholder, so it should be heard (at least). Additionally, you are followed by other major ones. What if we, the LBI, decided to sell all our Leo and bHBD tokens? This would certainly mess with their plans. I guess this all entitles us ti receive answers and public obligations - I'd love Khal to promise the HBD interests to be used into cub arbitration mechanism or simply to burn cub.
https://wallet.hive.blog/@bnb-hbd/transfers