Why can't they just say this in the first place? If rewards were declined for all posts while a project was being built to replace the daily articles, would that suffice?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why can't they just say this in the first place? If rewards were declined for all posts while a project was being built to replace the daily articles, would that suffice?
I'd suggest burning rewards.
That way only the author rewards are lost, the curation rewards remain.
The anti-abuse community has a poor record of delivering a calming bedside manner.
However, their mandates do make sense.
Lots of discussion and practice has gone into this over the last 6 years.
Thank you for explaining this so well. There were far too many accusatory terms and generalities used for a situation that required far more specificity and candor.
This helps a lot.
I'll go into account settings and have it set to decline payouts and hope that Beem doesn't overwrite that setting.