Charting and opinion posts like these have been abused in the past, they are not popular with some stakeholders.
The pool is of finite size, automated posts take away rewards from the not automated authors.
Ergo, posts that look 'low effort' will attract attention you don't want.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why can't they just say this in the first place? If rewards were declined for all posts while a project was being built to replace the daily articles, would that suffice?
I'd suggest burning rewards.
That way only the author rewards are lost, the curation rewards remain.
The anti-abuse community has a poor record of delivering a calming bedside manner.
However, their mandates do make sense.
Lots of discussion and practice has gone into this over the last 6 years.
Thank you for explaining this so well. There were far too many accusatory terms and generalities used for a situation that required far more specificity and candor.
This helps a lot.
I'll go into account settings and have it set to decline payouts and hope that Beem doesn't overwrite that setting.