Kwon Sung-dong, floor leader of People's Power, also claimed to the same effect the previous day, saying, "The individual judge's disposition beats professional conscience and his personal disposition is reflected in the ruling." This is a contradictory argument that contradicts his claim, which demanded Lee accept the result of the trial a day ago. Yoon Sang-hyun, a lawmaker of People's Power, also criticized the judiciary on the same day, raising a conspiracy theory that "we cannot erase the suspicion that it was the work of a left-wing judicial cartel from the Korean Law Research Association."
This is not the first time that the power of the people has launched an offensive that shakes the independence of the judiciary by saying that they do not like the outcome of the trial. When the court issued an arrest warrant and an arrest warrant for President Yoon Suk Yeol, the accused of rebellion, he did not hesitate to attack judges, and even used the activities of his spouse and younger brother as the subject of color theory for constitutional judges who are considering the impeachment trial of President Yoon.
In particular, floor leader Kwon led the promotion of distrust in the judiciary, saying, "Our Law Research Society is behind all unfair trials," but the first trial judge, who was not guilty of soliciting Kangwon Land's employment two years ago, was criticized for being "innerly indifferent."
Political circles are criticizing whether the conservative party, which considers the rule of law as a core value, is right. "Until just yesterday, floor leader Kwon Sung-dong threatened to accept the second trial's ruling as if he was sure of guilt, but today he seems to have changed his words again," said Cho Seung-rae, a senior spokesman for the Democratic Party of Korea. "This is why we cannot say that it is a normal party." Cho repeatedly claimed that "the power of the people is an abnormal party that disturbs the constitution of the Republic of Korea and the order of the judiciary."
It's not like you're arguing for a selective rule of law in your own way
He's not a conservative or a politician
It's like a cyber rack car.
The ruling I like is a fair one that must be accepted,
The ruling I don't like is a undermining of the rule of law,
There is only the sophistry of judicial manipulation that must be resisted to the end.
Now, I think we only need to put the impeachment ruling as a major concern.