A lawyer who mentioned the 'Daejang-dong case' and talked about 'manipulation of recordings'
On the other hand, Yoon's lawyers said, "It was made by the prosecution (evidence)," referring to the "Daejang-dong case," regarding the sound quality improvement video of the vehicle black box of former intelligence commander Roh Sang-won, which the special prosecutor for rebellion filed as evidence. The video is about former commander Roh's conversation after receiving a phone call from former commander Moon at 4:22 p.m. on December 2 last year. The special prosecution requested the National Digital Forensics Center of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office to improve the sound quality on January 13, and then wrote a transcript based on the sound quality improvement version, and applied for the original, sound quality improvement version and sound quality improvement version as evidence.
However, in the transcript, it is recorded that former commander Moon called former commander Roh "Minister" and said, "I've been reporting martial law to Minister Kim Yong-hyun." "I told you that I came after the Minister's 'face-to-face' report, and there was a face-to-face report on the special capabilities (of the intelligence agency) that day," former commander Moon said. "I usually called (former commander Roh) chief, and on the day (December 2nd), I called him 'Chief' and I was embarrassed because he was listed as 'General'." In addition, Won-hee, head of the intelligence division at the time, also attended the minister's report, adding, "That doesn't make sense."
Lawyer Wi Hyun-seok said, "It seems that (the prosecution) arbitrarily interpreted the black box video and wrote a transcript containing remarks that the witness did not actually make, right?"
Former intelligence commander Moon Sang-ho said, "Yes. (General, the fact that he said it was a martial law report) is not true."
Even at the beginning of the trial, lawyer Wi said, "The recording was written differently (from the actual remarks) from the Daejang-dong case. We cannot agree (to adopt evidence)." Here, the "Daejang-dong case" appears to be a report by Oh My News that the prosecution arbitrarily wrote the so-called "Jeong Young-hak transcript" during the investigation into the alleged development preferential treatment of Daejang-dong (related article: [Exclusive] Did you change it to weave Lee Jae-myung... The prosecution's manipulation of the "Jeong Young-hak transcript" came out https://omn.kr/2g12p) . The court decided to further discuss whether to adopt the evidence of the video and transcript.
Copyright © Oh My News. No unauthorized reproduction and redistribution.
"No matter how foolish a person may be, they would never believe and say such a thing.
If not, then it means they are even worse than I thought.
Truly, there are only these two possibilities I can imagine.
Both are sad situations."