A Much Bigger Threat

[doitvoluntarily]

There is a much bigger threat to not only every individual in the United States, but also to millions around the world, and that is the United States government. Mass attention might be distracted right now on other issues like which popular apps might pose a potential privacy or propaganda threat, meanwhile there is more pressing criminality right at home that deserves the same attention.

When your own government is stealing more than common criminals, who is the bigger threat? Criminals at home? Criminals overseas? Or people who say they're protecting you from criminals while engaging in wrongdoing against innocent people.

Tyranny that is courtesy of your own tax dollars and representatives.

When you want to talk about the lies and corruption that the U.S. government over the years has been involved in, where does one even start?

They Are Taking Billions From Innocent Americans

Imagine an organization if you will that acts as if they've been tasked with serving the basic needs of the public, but all the while they have been allegedly stealing billions of dollars from innocent people who have never been charged with a crime.

In regular circles this is a pretty clear example of theft to take something from someone when they've done nothing wrong. And to find out that it happens to the extent that it does right in the United States of America, you might think that this environment sounds like a fairly corrupt place. After all, aren't you innocent until proven guilty? But if you are innocent, why does your life savings get unjustly confiscated to the point you must endure a costly and lengthy battle to get it back? That doesn't sound like any sort of freedom that should be celebrated, but a culture of tyranny.

After all, if someone is innocent and has been charged with no wrongdoing, why should their life savings or any amount of money be justified in being stolen from them? It shouldn't.

It is a great tyranny being perpetrated against millions across the United States and there have been few who have been fighting back against it over the last decade or more. Some have ruled just the same, that it's a practice which must be stopped and it's blatantly unconstitutional. It's estimated that more than 80 percent of Americans also oppose the policy, and that's considering that many of them probably don't have the faintest idea what the policy is or its practice involves.

For those who care about innocent people being victimized, or the idea that you should have the right to your own property etc, then this sort of injustice should fuel a bit of outrage.

GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN FOUND STEALING MORE THAN BURGLARS

The government pretends to be here to serve the basic need of protecting us against others who might want to harm us. But then we look a bit deeper and we see that they are confiscating more assets than burglars themselves in the country.

When the police are taking more money and property from innocent people than non official criminals are, then you've got an obvious problem to deal with.

It is clear the one who they serve most is themselves.

An organization, which happens to be the biggest violent monopoly in the world, doesn't seem to pay any mind to your "freedom or security" when they violate your basic natural rights without a thought as we have seen them do on numerous occasions.

Pics:
pixabay

Comments

[lighteye]

And there is only one bigger threat above the United States government and all state governments — WHO as the core of world government.

[valued-customer]

"...the one who they serve most is themselves."

This is a principle that is ubiquitous in life. It can also be expressed as 'God helps them that help themselves.' It is why it is better to provide for your own needs rather than depend on others for them. It is how people should live, and the impositions of government are contrary to best practices withal.

Do what is necessary to provide for your needs, assist others to do so as a good neighbor, and leave the depredations of criminals to those that can afford their services. It is only possible to be subject if you are dependent.

Be sovereign instead.

Thanks!