Downvoted for celebrating and encouraging the attempted murder of me and my wife and children and friends.
If Iran or someone else, like Russia, fires 130 x 20 Ton ballistic missiles at your country (UK?) you will suffer 10s or 100s of thousands of deaths.
Wake up, they are coming for you next.
If you are in the UK you should be really worried because your nuclear deterrent (submarine based nuclear missiles) has just been revealed to be as unreliable as Iranian missiles. Russia is going to have revenge against the UK for its very active involvement in Ukraine.
I think this discussion is important to have. I would not think down-voting would be appropriate. Like we see too often when opposing views do not debate because they don't want to give each other "a platform".
Had me and mine been ethnically cleansing the indigenes from where I reside - as happened a century ago - I would expect it. Russia has no end of payback to serve, but given it's kleptocratic tyranny is beholden to Chabad Lubavitch that rules the West, I expect Russia to suffer the same fate as the parasitized West, through that very vector.
Nations that allow such verminous infestations continually suffer the same fate, but since it's only exacted bi-generationally, people unaware of history continually repeat it. The insidious influence of child sex trafficking on political and other institutions is comparable to drinking hemlock, although it's far worse, IMHO. Chabad Lubavitch poses as a religious cult of whackos following a dead Messiah, but in fact chains peoples and nations with threads of gold and corruption, as the following pic reveals by the blood stained child sized mattresses their tunnels contained under their world headquarters in NYC.
What you sow, so shall you reap. Nothing good will come of being so practiced at being so evil.
I appreciate the courtesy of being informed why you have sought to censor my views.
Edit: also, did you forget that Iran was retaliating against an attack from Israel? Pretty disingenuous to claim to be the victim of an attack that is simply defending themselves from attacks you have slaveringly supported. Exactly what I expect from you.
They couldn't keep from praising the guy for his role in the 10/7 attacks in their eulogy (see my first comment on your post) My guess is Israel knew who they were targetting. Looks like retaliation for a counter-attack.
That's making the claim that Iran controls Hamas, which is not credible. It's far more credible to make the claim that Israel controls Hamas, since they created it to weaken the PA, and have ensured it received suitcases of $15M in cash monthly from Qatar ever since. Further the IDF clearly stood down for ~7 hours after the Hamas attack began, which can only be considered collusion. Finally, many of the dead Israeli civilians were killed by the IDF, as has been revealed by statements of IDF pilots and survivors, and examination of the evidence of Hellfire missiles at the rave, and tanks at the kibbutz (before Israel bulldozed it).
If you take things at face value, as you say.
Edit: neither is it lawful to attack a country for harboring a fugitive, as has also happened when Ecuador forcibly extracted Glas from the Mexican embassy. It is a war crime. Embassies are granted diplomatic immunity in order to prevent such crimes, and only rogue states violate such legal status. States that cannot respect the law regarding diplomatic immunity cannot participate in international diplomacy as a result, and war is the only diplomacy left them.
Mexico has taken it's complaint to the bar instead of prosecuting war. Iran did not, but neither was it required to under the laws of war.
I don't see that claim that Iran controls Hamas here. I see a claim that officials in the know let it slip that he was essential to the attack. If it is against the rules of war to attack an embassy, like it is to attack a hospital, then we may be seeing a pattern of depending on these protections as a military strategy.
We are certainly seeing a pattern of lawless war crimes on the part of Israel.
Regarding Iran, if Iran didn't control Hamas, then how could it be lawful to attack Iran as some sort of retribution for 10/7? Wouldn't the proper legal procedure be to request Iran turn over the alleged criminal for lawful prosecution?
Of course, that wouldn't work unless there was actual evidence they were a criminal.
I feel pretty sure that Israel considers themselves in a war that Iran helped to start. The individual was a military target because of what he did, perhaps they also had reason to believe he was still a threat. The fog of war is covering much of what we can know. This is deepened by the propaganda. I am always looking for how a story could have been staged or manuafactured by either side. This is why it is notable that we have an admission of why he was targetted after the official line had been they had no role in the attack.
Well, Israel officially started the war by attacking Iranian clay. That's the facts on the ground. Israel has clearly been agitating for this war - between the US and Iran - for decades. That makes what they say about this particular act without merit or meaning, as if anything serial liars say could have meaning or merit.
Again, there are procedures that have evolved from international relations regarding extradition of criminals. Starting wars with countries to kill the accused isn't lawful or acceptable diplomatically by any civilized nation.