I think guns are the weapon of choice for those who want to kill a lot of people in the U.S because they are available. Where guns are less available, you see more things like improvised explosive devices or people simply ramming crowds of people with a vehicle. I don't think it is particularly useful to compare only mass shootings. Comparing "mass killings" (or however you want to say it), regardless of weapon choice, makes more sense. Otherwise the implication is that simply making guns unavailable will solve the problem and I do not believe that is the case.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: