Now jokes aside, where are you going - flat earth, concave earth...? I've fallen in love with expanding earth for all its sense-making and can't explain the atmosphere's super-rotation with "Coriolis" forces because I'm afraid of phantoms. And now that the ISS debunking almost convinced me (RE-watching "A funny thing" right now), I wonder about MIR and Skylab.
..dont follow me... im lost too ; ) well im waay past heliocentric model, and i think its flat and planish, im not feeling concave, i like endless plane and other puddles, but who knows...that might just be a reaction to the idea we are in this tiny enclosed firmament instead if an infinite place....i cant hardly imagine infinity anymore, it has all become to feel too much like its being overlooked by that guy in the truman show... i am doing coriolis tests in my kitchen sink so much i have broken the seal... The NASA clowns debunk themselves, just watch their press conferences... so much on ISS is fake, greenscreen, done with cables or in a zero g plane (you can tell by the jerks the jerks make) you have to wonder, if theyre really up there, why all the fakery?... I know nada about skylab and MIR but the more i look the more I realise even when i think the moon landings were hoaxed, i went on and believed every other thing they told me and showed me since... without question... satellites, distant galaxies, black holes X D and just this year i have started to reappraise ALL ELSE NASA has told me, and the more i look the more i think its all hooey
I know, but at least we're not lost and alone then!
It is true that the obvious NASA fakery gives the game away when it comes to moon walks and many ISS feeds. Alone the comparison between the ISS gal with the permed hair and the other gal's free-flowing hair in a real vomit comet micro-g environment did serious damage to my ability and willingness to defend the space program (the green screen sealed the deal); but it would be too extreme to discard all the insights into the shape of our planet and the surrounding universe found before NASA together with it. It's all a bit disorienting.
Now jokes aside, where are you going - flat earth, concave earth...? I've fallen in love with expanding earth for all its sense-making and can't explain the atmosphere's super-rotation with "Coriolis" forces because I'm afraid of phantoms. And now that the ISS debunking almost convinced me (RE-watching "A funny thing" right now), I wonder about MIR and Skylab.
Soo following you.
..dont follow me... im lost too ; ) well im waay past heliocentric model, and i think its flat and planish, im not feeling concave, i like endless plane and other puddles, but who knows...that might just be a reaction to the idea we are in this tiny enclosed firmament instead if an infinite place....i cant hardly imagine infinity anymore, it has all become to feel too much like its being overlooked by that guy in the truman show... i am doing coriolis tests in my kitchen sink so much i have broken the seal... The NASA clowns debunk themselves, just watch their press conferences... so much on ISS is fake, greenscreen, done with cables or in a zero g plane (you can tell by the jerks the jerks make) you have to wonder, if theyre really up there, why all the fakery?... I know nada about skylab and MIR but the more i look the more I realise even when i think the moon landings were hoaxed, i went on and believed every other thing they told me and showed me since... without question... satellites, distant galaxies, black holes X D and just this year i have started to reappraise ALL ELSE NASA has told me, and the more i look the more i think its all hooey
I know, but at least we're not lost and alone then!
It is true that the obvious NASA fakery gives the game away when it comes to moon walks and many ISS feeds. Alone the comparison between the ISS gal with the permed hair and the other gal's free-flowing hair in a real vomit comet micro-g environment did serious damage to my ability and willingness to defend the space program (the green screen sealed the deal); but it would be too extreme to discard all the insights into the shape of our planet and the surrounding universe found before NASA together with it. It's all a bit disorienting.