You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: "WHAT IS DEPRESSION?" Let's talk about depression and how we can fight for it.

in #life • 7 years ago

I understand your point and I don't disagree with it. Kita mo naman diba, na support ako sa komento mo sa post niya. Talagang kailangan namang talagang i cite properly, ang ninanais ko lang sa komento ko ay ang paraan ng pagpapaliwanag sa user na kailangan niyang gawin iyan.

Alam kong you are capable of changing people's behavior and I commend you for doing it. I'm impressed and at the same time inspired for taking time of correcting people's mistake in this platform.

Gusto ko lang ihighlight na constructive criticism stands out in helping people grow here.

7 years ago in #life by
$0.00
    Reply 2
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago  

    While I do acknowledge what you are trying to say, I would have to insist that this is the minimum mercy threshold I could tolerate for abuse post. What I would have done if I was hell bent on punishing him:

    1. Instant flag, then tag @ --steemflagrewards citing plagiarism.
    2. Report the post to steemcleaners.
    3. Then leave a cute dialogue that I've bookmarked his blog and would periodically visit it just to fish something I could flag within the abuse guidelines I am functioning.

    But nope, didn't do all that. He was nice enough to admit the mistake so you didn't see me follow up the message or prolong the conversation. Whereas, your intro

    "Anong don't me na sinasabi mo? Pwede naman atang constructive criticism ang paglagay ng komento. "

    Isn't a tone you would start to use when you intend to be diplomatic about it. It's exactly the same tone I used from my first comment on the blog. Your recent reply IS the right tone that is congruent to what you have preached just now.

    For the sake of not prolonging this conversation we can just drop this because the issue has been resolved (afaik). But for the record, I have identified 6 instances where he could have prevented me from bothering to comment.

    1. He knew the content he was writing weren't all his but paraphrased so bearing in mind that citation have crossed his mind.
    2. While he was nitpicking on the guides on what include in this work, he still had a chance to cite them.
    3. After posting the article, he had a chance to edit it still and take back his mistake.
      4-5 these were the number of times he edited his post after doing it the first time which sums up to a total of 5 chances he forfeited.

    I have spent more than half my steemit career flagging and reporting abuse post, get retaliation flags, and do my share to keep the reward pool from being raped. Pag namulat ka sa katotohanan na maraming steem at sbd ang napupunta lang sa mga pekeng artist, manunulat at pabibong huwad, lahat ng pag abuso pare pareho lang yung itsura at ibang pangalan.

    Ideally, constructive criticism works on paper. But try using that approach while joining me fight abuse, I don't mind being proven wrong. I want to be proven wrong. Use that SP to flag abuse posts, make real enemies out of abusers. When you reached that level, maybe I'll be more receptive about saying nice things to abusers.

    $0.00
      Reply